Thursday, May 5, 2016

Forever Mine




As a filmmaker from a strict Dutch Calvinist background that makes intellectually oriented films about supremely fucked-up and oftentimes self-destructive individuals who once confessed that he was finally able to learn how to properly touch and have normal relationships with woman by hanging out with very touchy-feely oriented gay men, film critic turned screenwriter turned cinematic auteur Paul Schrader (Mishima: A Life in Four Chapters, The Canyons)—arguably the last worthwhile and fairly untainted filmmaker of the so-called New Hollywood movement—does not exactly seem like someone that would be suitable for directing a lavish tragic romance with a sort of classic Golden Age Hollywood style yet he did just that and naturally it is one strange and sometimes baffling cinematic monster that makes love seem like a morbid mental illness that consumes the soul. Indeed, Schrader’s self-described “beauty filmForever Mine (1999) is, in many ways, not only the director’s most bizarre work, but also his most overt artistic disaster as a shockingly ambitious flick that is ultimately, quite unfortunately, less than the sum of its parts, though nonetheless certainly worth seeing at least once, especially for those that already have an appreciation for the auteur (after all, the film is superior to a number of the director's other works, including Blue Collar (1978), Light Of Day (1987), Witch Hunt (1994), Touch (1997), Dominion: Prequel to the Exorcist (2005), Adam Resurrected (2008), and the studio-destroyed The Dying of the Light (2014)). In fact, I would almost argue that the film is a cinematic tragedy, as a would neo-Sirkian romantic epic that was supposed to seamlessly weave elements of a Scorseseian guido gangster flick and a De Palma crime-thriller, yet ultimately does not completely work as it was supposed to due to various reasons, not least of all lead Joseph Fiennes' glaringly uneven performance in a dual role. As Schrader has described in interviews, Fiennes had the impossible tasking of playing “Leonardo DiCaprio in TITANIC and Pacino in CARLITO'S WAY in the same movie.” As for female lead Gretchen Mol, she demonstrates that she was a cold yet compulsively cute cunt long before her role as the always charming son-fucking whore murderess Gillian Darmody on Boardwalk Empire (2010-2014).

Originally written by Schrader in the late-1980s for producer Alan Ladd (not to be confused with the tragic actor of the same name) at MGM and later brought to Columbia Pictures where Patrick Swayze of all people was originally scheduled to play the lead role, Forever Mine was ultimately put on the backburner for over a decade until after the director began filming his minor masterpiece Affliction (1997) in Montreal and he randomly met a Sri Lanka-Born conman named Damita Nikapota—a supremely shady fellow that was later imprisoned for using dead film producers' identities and producing imaginary films with titles like ‘The Flying Scotsman’—who luckily agreed to raise funds for the film.  While Schrader finally managed to complete his dream romance flick, it succumbed to a similar sorry fate as many of his other films and ultimately made its debut on the Starz! cable channel instead of theaters after the film’s production company went bankrupt and its assets were taken over by its Dutch insurers, who did not seem too keen on even promoting the film. Described by Schrader himself as being, “…nineteenth-century schmaltz: the formerly-thought-dead lover comes back in altered form, that Count of Monte Cristo/Heathcliff thing. I was trying to tap into the old sense of melodrama, with very lush visuals, and make a retro movie,” Forever Mine is indeed an oftentimes pleasantly pulchritudinous yet mean-spirited and even misanthropic piece of rather refreshing filmic fluff with a dark and demented romantic edge that questions the sanity of individuals that completely submit to pure love, especially when it involves a treacherous woman that has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that she can never ever be trusted. In short, the film more or less portrays men that devote themselves to one single woman as recklessly self-destructive fools with their heads in the clouds who do not know when to quit and women as petty and callous and almost wholly glacial creatures that tend to prefer being with a wealthy and powerful man who cannot even get their pussy wet to a modest man that they love and have an otherworldly sexual relationship with.

Featuring an original score by David Lynch regular Angelo Badalamenti, Schrader's rather artistically ardent film depicts in a somewhat aesthetically schizophrenic way the internal purgatory a young lovelorn man is trapped in after finding his one-true-love in a sunny beach paradise, only for said one-true-love to betray him in a nearly deadly fashion that results in both his physical and psychological transformation in what is ultimately a rare relatively contemporary American movie that demonstrates in a largely allegorical way the sort of misery that a woman can afflict on her lover, especially when monetary concerns are involved.



As made quite clear in Easy Riders, Raging Bulls (1998) by Peter Biskind, Schrader is anything but a lady’s man and when he was getting his start as a young screenwriter in Hollywood during the 1970s, no woman wanted anything to do with him, or as one excerpt from the book reveals, “Women didn’t like Schrader, didn’t appreciate his finer points. He had a crush on [Margot] Kidder. One night, the two of them were driving along Sunset in his car to meet Brian [De Palma] at a screening. ‘Kiss me! Kiss me!’ he implored, out of the blue. She pulled away […] Paul was crushed, felt like he must display the mark of Cain. She slept with everything in pants—except him […] Like Kidder, Sandy Weintraub couldn’t stand Schrader: ‘Paul was a very messed up human being. When he left his apartment, he went to a bar and sat there and drank all night.’” Indeed, when not bonding over guns with Hebraic ‘Zen Fascist’ John Milius and hanging out with his cocksucking comrades in a cocaine-fueled gay party scene, Schrader was failing badly with the ladies and it was only when he became an established filmmaker that things began to slightly change. For example, while working on his first self-described “beauty filmCat People (1982), Schrader began a short-lived ‘romance’ with lead heroine Nastassja Kinski that ended with a failed marriage proposal and the filmmaker traveling to Europe to chase his love interest, who ultimately terribly humiliated him by stating, “Paul, I always fuck my directors.  And with you it was difficult.”  Like Cat People, Forever Mine features a Dante and Beatrice motif, though it is clear that Schrader, who went on to marry and have children with actress Mary Beth Hurt, has grown quite cynical as the years have passed in regard to pure love, especially when it comes to seemingly immaculately beauteous young women whose physical allurement is in stark contrast to their minds and souls.  A sort of gleefully genre-bending romance-crime-drama-thriller that updates the theme of classic ancient Occidental myths like Tristan and Iseult and Orpheus and Eurydice in regard to love and sexuality compatibility not exactly always making for the most perfect of relationships, Schrader's artistically enterprising experiment in narrative construction is a sort of romance flick for cynics who have given up on love yet still have nostalgia for past loves.



Schrader’s first film shot in CinemaScope, Forever Mine is somewhat of an unintentionally eccentric aesthetic enigma as a cinematic work that transforms from a sort of candycolored beachside fairytale into a bourgeois Victorian Gothic erotic thriller, with early Fassbinder style dilapidated apartment scenes, flagrant Scorsese-esque Catholic imagery, and post-industrial ruins thrown in for good measure. Indeed, the film might by a mess of a movie in various ways, but it is a surprisingly enthralling mess of a movie with an oftentimes unpredictable yet absurdly improbable storyline that defies all sense and logical to the point of being embarrassingly addictive, even on subsequent viewings (in fact, I have watched the film four times and it holds up each time). Featuring stereotypically boorish and moronic garlic-marinated guido gangsters with fragile egos, a shamelessly and psychopathically corrupt politician that find romantic poetry to be the language of a raving retard, an Anglo-Saxon college student that magically transforms into extremely wealthy disfigured Latino black market ‘banker’ with connections to Contras and the South American drug underworld, and a fine ass female protagonist whose insufferable frigidness can only be penetrated by the protagonist’s prick and incessant flowery poetic pronouncements, the film may have various dubious ingredients that have about as much as chemistry as Godiva chocolate and sun-fried dog shit, but it never fails to enthrall and surprise. Undoubtedly, another intriguing element of the film is that it features a sort of Dionysian hero that makes insanely irrational and oftentimes highly deleterious decisions for love and an Apollonian antagonist that is a cruel and calculating politician who specifically loathes the protagonist because of his talent for lurid love poetry and absurdly romantic Weltanschauung. Indeed, to the scumbag antagonist’s credit, the protagonist is nothing if not a ludicrously lovesick fool who practically invites his own death not once but twice just so that he can prove to himself that his “love is pure,” hence his vocal willingness to die for love.




After beginning with the somewhat fitting yet slightly pretentious Walter Pater quote, “It is the addition of strangeness to beauty that constitutes the romantic character in art” and an opening credit sequence featuring an almost obscenely pink fantasy castle that is ultimately revealed to be a hotel (in fact, the hotel in question, Loews Don CeSar Hotel in St. Pete Beach, Florida, was also used in Robert Altman's HealtH (1980) and Sergio Leone's Once Upon a Time in America (1984)), the film cuts to a shot of a man with a disfigured face named Manuel Esquema (Joseph Fiennes) sitting on an airplane next to his friend and body guard Javier Cesti (Vincent Laresca) while looking particularly forlorn, as if he is haunted by something and/or someone from his past. The year is 1987 and Esquema—a WASP pretending to be a Latino that has literally created a totally new identity for himself—is flying from Miami to New York to confront his past in the form of both the woman he loved who betrayed him and the man that thought he killed him. The last time these two people saw Esquema, he was a poor bum with big romantic dreams that lived in a dirty dilapidated apartment, but now he is an extremely wealthy international financier that does business with banks from all around the world, especially dirty ones. Flash back “14 years earlier,” the same man is depicted riding a bus to a Miami, though his name is not Esquema but Alan Riply and he is a terribly naïve yet passionate 23-year-old college student that has come to the coast of southeastern Florida to work as a lowly cabana boy at a luxury castle-like hotel with his somewhat hyperactive Hispanic homeboy Javier. While Javier attempts to coerce Alan into getting into the drug dealing business with him, the protagonist has his mind on somewhat more savory and romantic things, especially after he randomly spots a blonde beauty named Ella Brice (Gretchen Mol) emerging from the water one day while he is working on the beach. Using his job as a cabana boy as a reason to immediately introduce himself to her, Alan almost immediately becomes wax-poetic around Ella, who seems intrigued with the protagonist’s somewhat idiosyncratic way with words, radiating charms, and inordinate kindness and empathy. Of course, as a seemingly long-suffering wife in a lonely one-sided marriage with an up-and-coming New York politician who clearly is more interested in his work than her tits and ass, Ella cannot help but be smitten with the cute and charming cabana boy, who has her complete and undivided attention. As Ella will later confess to Alan, she, like many women, only married her husband Mark Brice (Ray Liotta) for his power and money, as she was previously a poor secretary that was ashamed of her humble background and cheap clothes. Needless to say, when Ella ends up falling in love with the poor cabana boy, she has a hard time fighting her natural female instincts towards hypergamy and cannot possible fathom dumping her successful husband for an eccentric hopeless romantic who speaks in riddles and does not have a penny to his name.




Naturally, as a man that seems to believe that he fallen in love at first sight and is convinced that he must dedicate every moment of the rest of his life to one single woman, Alan—an obsessive romantic that spends his free time in his scantly decorated one-room apartment staring at a photo of his love interest—almost immediately begins borderline stalking Ella and when the heroine soon realizes this she becomes both fearful of and infatuated with the eccentric young cabana boy. Indeed, after strategically recommending that her husband Mark go to the hotel’s nightclub one night, Alan shows up to said nightclub to spy on Ella while lurking in the shadows like a shy Don Juan that has yet to completely cultivate his romantic moves. When Ella leaves the club alone, Alan follows her home to declare his love for her, stating, “I think you’re extraordinary,” but she coldly replies, “There’s always another woman.” While Ella blows Alan off and tells him, “If my husband even saw us standing here—he doesn’t think anything is innocent,” she is clearly intrigued by the protagonist and voyeuristically gazes at him from her hotel window after they part ways, as if she regrets not immediately jumping on his cock.  Indeed, one gets the impression that Ella got extremely wet as a result of the short conversation with Alan and immediately diddled her clit upon entering her hotel room. The next day, Alan is quite delighted when Ella approaches him on the beach while carrying a pink bikini and boldly declares to him in an overtly salacious fashion, “I was wondering what it would be like for us to kiss.” Not only do the two soon kiss right there on the beach, but Alan also manages to coerce Ella into faking sick as a way to blow off a boat trip with her husband so that she can spend the evening with with him instead. Needless to say, Alan and Ella immediately make otherworldly orgasmic love that clearly penetrates the heroine in a fashion that she previously never felt possible. After the lovemaking session, the two go to a local bar where the two act like completely innocent youthful high school lovers and Ella states to Alan in an unintentionally incriminating fashion during a rare moment of vulnerability, “Sometimes it just amazes me. We’re all so self-centered. And then you look around and you see everyone else. Everyone is the main character in their lives. They all have a story.” Of course, as the trophy wife of an insanely arrogant and self-centered opportunistic asshole who does not take her seriously, Ella barely has a life and she makes for an awfully banal and passive main character in her own story.




Despite everything being so perfectly magical during their wild and wanton day of fucking, Ella demonstrates that she might be a tad bit bipolar by randomly turning into a cold bitch that same exact night. Indeed, after cynically stating that her hotel is nothing more than a “fantasy castle” and that she is in “fantasyland,” Ella tells Alan her sob “story,” stating in a somewhat bitchy fashion, “I was in the secretarial pool…Xeroxing, getting coffee, guys making jokes about me, the way I dressed. I didn’t have any money. We didn’t have any money. We moved from place to place. And then…guess what? The boss started asking me out. Everything changed. Then I became…Mrs. Mark Brice. So…you like my story? Are you disappointed?” While Alan attempts to get Ella to leave her husband for him by simply stating with supreme confidence, “You will never be loved the way you are now. You never have been, and you never will be,” her transformation into an ice queen is already complete and she declares, “I’m leaving tomorrow, it’s over!” Naturally, being someone that was previously a working-class broad, Ella cannot fathom going back to living a life of lame lumpenprole stagnancy and describes Alan’s plan as simply “impossible.” While Alan stoically declares, “Refusal to love is just an excuse for cowardice. Emotional cowardice,” Ella is just too damn feminine to have any intrinsic understanding of cowardice and will later betray her true love in such a pathetically pusillanimous fashion that it almost results in his death.  Like most women, Ella is very concerned with her future security, yet what happens to the man she loves never really seems to cross her mind.




When Ella leaves the hotel with her husband to go back to the sterile suburbs of New York after their vacation is over, Alan immediately quits his job and borrows his homey Javier’s car so that he can drive to his beloved's hometown where he plans to relocate permanently. Indeed, Alan wastes no time in acquiring an entry level position at a bank and renting a dilapidated one-room apartment in a quaint ghetto. While Ella is excited when she learns that Alan has moved nearby to be with her and the two once again have great sex after she sneaks out of her house to pay him a visit, the heroine once again morphs into a quite cunty ice queen during a post-coital conversation involving cheap Chinese takeout where she expresses her abject disgust with his crummy apartment (where the protagonist has notably written “Give All To Love” across the wall) and how she cannot bear the thought again of having to live in such a lowly fashion ever again. In short, Ella, like many women, is unwilling to settle for hypogamy and tells the protagonist that there is no way that she could ever considering divorcing Mark and getting with him, stating like the most fiercely frigid of quasi-lesbianic public school administrators, “Think, Alan. A person just can’t wake up and start over.”  Of course, Ella can do whatever the hell she wants and is just making excuses for the fact that she has been hopelessly despoiled by her nice and laid-back bourgeois lifestyle.

Quite unlike Alan, Ella is petrified of spontaneity, uncertainty, and selfless devotion, thus making her a sort of archetype for the worst qualities that members of the so-called fairer sex have to offer, though the protagonist seems to be in total denial of this. After going to a Catholic confessional where a busybody priest persuades her to stop betraying her husband and break off her relationship with Alan, Ella unwisely decides to tell Mark everything while crying seemingly phony tears as if she is some sort of victim that needs to be rescued instead of an adulterous liar. In an assumed classically feminine attempt to garner sympathy while attempting to project all of her guilt solely onto the protagonist, Ella cries to her husband in regard to Alan, “I wish I never met him.”  Of course, what Ella really means when she says that she wishes that “never met him” is that she hates that she has been forced to acknowledge the fact that Alan made her come to the bitter realization that she is in a soulless sham marriage and that she could be so much happier with someone else, but she is too weak and materialistic to devote herself to the man she loves. Needless to say, Mark immediately decides that he has to do something about the “lovesick cabana boy” and uses his political power to get Alan arrested on trumped up charges by having a couple corrupt cops plant drugs on him. While Alan is in prison, Mark pays him a visit and, somewhat surprisingly, offers to have his charges “dropped on a technicality” if he agrees leave Ella alone, but of course the protagonist adamantly refuses and proudly proclaiming, “Everything has a purpose. Everybody has a purpose. It is my purpose to be with Ella. Nothing can change that. Not you, not the police, not the courts. It’s just a fact…like plants turning to the sun. Or death. Or taxes.” Needless to say, Mark is less than impressed with Alan’s way with words and hilariously states to him in a condescending fashion as if he were talking to a mentally challenged child, “What is this gibberish and asks “Are you crazy? Nobody talks like this. Make sense […] There are two types of people in this world: assholes and pricks. You’re an asshole. And I’m a prick. Do the math. Ella’s mine.”




When Mark eventually discovers that Alan has been writing absurdly arcane love letters to Ella from prison, he becomes exceedingly enraged, decides he must have his romantically unhinged rival liquidated, and ultimately has his short-tempered guido body guard Rick Martino (Myk Watford) setup a staged prison break that involves fugitive inmates dragging the protagonist to a construction set where he is shot and dropped in a large hole. Needless to say, when Mark boasts of Alan’s dubious death, Ella, who is drunk, breaks down and accuses her husband of killing him.  Needless to say, Mark gets a little annoyed with Ella's back-talking and slaps her across the face so hard that she falls to the floor. After confessing to her priest, “I was a…coward,” Ella completely loses her faith and never steps back into a church ever again. Meanwhile, after somehow magically surviving a shotgun blast that badly damages both his arm and half of his face, Alan manages to crawl back to Miami while in a half-dead state where he immediately pays his loyal friend Javier a late night visit. After pleading that he needs “money to buy a new life,” Javier informs him that he can earth both $5,000 and a great underworld reputation by killing a man for a powerful drug cartel. With nothing left to lose as a man that has been robbed of his lady love, pretty boy good looks, and entire future, Alan manages to gather the courage and morally bankruptcy to kill a man that he does not even know named Manuel Esquema while the poor bloated beaner is quietly defecating in a public restroom. In a strange but somewhat fitting twist, Alan opts to adopt the name and identity of the man he so ruthlessly murdered and ultimately transforms himself from an all-American WASP into a sly Latino gangster.  Indeed, Alan even contrives a preposterous pseudo-poetic sob story that he later uses on Mark and Ella about how he was born deformed to a poor but loving family that taught him to be the highly successful career criminal that he is today.




At about the halfway point of Forever Mine, the film finally catches up to the present with Manuel/Alan finally arriving in New York to initiate his long awaited reunion with Ella and her hubby. Naturally, Alan has a personal vendetta against Mark and after discovering that his nemesis is now an ex-councilman that is about to be indicted by federal prosecutor for serious criminal charges, he decides to use his new identity as ‘Manuel Esquema’ and power as a powerful international financier to execute his quite cleverly constructed revenge plan. Indeed, with a completely new appearance, accent, and speech pattern, ‘Manuel’ has no problem convincing Mark that he is someone else and that he wants to help him get out of his legal bind, so long as he willing to pay a ‘fair’ amount for his services.  Needless to say, Alan intends to take Ella as part of his payment, though Mark will not find this out until the services are rendered.  Of course, Alan also his new identity as Señor Esquema as a means to get close to Ella who, despite everything, he still loves. When Mark invites Esquema over to his house for dinner after their first business meeting, he gladly accepts the offer as it provides him with the opportunity to see Ella for the first time in fourteen years. Not surprisingly, Ella seems totally phony when Alan arrives at her house, as if she is doing her best to the mask the perennial misery, guilt, and regret that plagues her quite posh yet pathetic life of perpetual bourgeois banality. As it turns out, the only thing that Ella has done over the past fourteen years is take pointless college courses and volunteer her time to reading to elderly people at a retirement home. When the protagonist asks her what her favorite book is, Ella rather revealingly declares with great joy that it is Gustave Flaubert's debut novel Madame Bovary (1856), which hints that the heroine is probably nostalgic about her past romance with Alan and has even considered committing suicide, as the book deals with the adulterous affairs of an eponymous protagonist who decides to have extramarital affairs because she hates her bourgeoisie life and who ultimately kills herself  in the end. Rather shocked that anyone would have any sincere interest in what his spouse has to say since he clearly considers her nothing more than a trophy wife that he used as an aesthetically pleasing prop for his political career, Mark remarks to the protagonist while he is listening intently as Ella talks, “I can’t believe you’re really interested in this.” During the same conversation, Ella also unwittingly reveals that she is rather unhappy with the fact that, although long married and quite financially secure, she is a barren woman by abruptly stating with a sense of pathetic hopeless excitement, “Oh, if I had a child I would love that child.”  Indeed, while it is a natural female instinct for a woman to marry a wealthy and successful man so that she will have a good provider for her children, Ella did not even get any kids out of her sham marriage, thus all the more underscoring the absurdity of her decision to betray Alan and stay with Mark.  While Alan gives small hints of his true identity and wastes no opportunity to make Mark feel uneasy, the unhappily married couple surely does not believe that people come back from the dead and thus never suspect that the protagonist is anyone aside from an preternaturally poetic Latino weirdo with tons of money and a vulgar fashion sense.




When Alan has Ella meet him at a NYC bar under the dubious pretext of needing to find important information from her that will supposedly help him with her husband’s criminal case, the protagonist almost immediately causes her to leave the taproom abruptly after he less than tactfully declares, “I just wanted to talk to you alone.” When Ella asks him, “What do you really want?,” Alan cryptically replies, “I think you know.” Shortly after his fairly uneventful encounter with Ella, Mark’s guido bodyguard Rick intentionally crashes his car into the back of Alan’s vehicle while he is parked at a gas station pump and then threatening states to the protagonist and his friend Javier, “You guys, you think you’re really something, don’t you? You slick Miami spicks come up here to fleece these dumb New Yorkers? You go sneakin’ around, behind the boss’ back, spyin’ on his wife? Well, you think I’m on medication, huh? Just ‘cause I’m white don’t mean I’m dumb.” Of course, Rick is probably pissed off over the fact that Alan previously embarrassed him by calling him a “guido” during a business meeting in front of his boss and other important men. Somewhat ironically for a man that loathes “slick Miami spicks,” Rick is ultimately brutally murdered that night while getting a fake tan at a tacky tanning salon called ‘Miami Bronze.’ Indeed, Alan’s #2 guy Javier has a showdown with Mark’s #2 guy Rick that involves the former torturing and killing the latter while he is trapped in a tanning bed while wearing nothing but whitey tighties. Before putting a bullet in his brain, Javier states to Rick what is ultimately a rather lame pun in reference to Ripley's Believe It or Not! amusement museum franchise, “Alan Riply, believe it or not.” Meanwhile, Alan breaks into the Brice’s home and waits for Ella while hiding in the shadows of her bedroom like an awkward vampire. While Ella is initially petrified when she enters her house becomes she knows that Señor Esquema is waiting for her inside since his car is parked in her driveway, it is clear that she is just as excited, as if she is entranced by his erotic magnetism but does not know what to expect and is afraid of the consequences. When Ella shouts out his name and threatens to call the cops, the protagonist emerges from the shadows of her bedroom and reveals his true identity, thus resulting in very long-and-coming makeup sex that involves the heroine fucking the protagonist on the very same bed that she shares with her hubby. After the carnal passions have climaxed, Ella states to Alan while the two are still in bed during a classic moment of stereotypical female post-coital disclosure, “I’ve lived my life in regret.” When Ella asks if he had sex with her out of revenge, Alan confesses, “Even when I thought I no longer cared for you, I still do” and foolishly agrees to not murder Mark like he had originally planned to. At this point, Ella finally declares that she wants to “start over again” and begin a new life with Alan.




During their final business meeting, Esquema informs Mark that he has setup a plea bargain where he will plead guilty and only have to serve 10 months at a comfortable white collar prison. While Esquema tells Mark that he can keep his house, car, and $300,000, he demands $600,000 for his services. Considering the severity of his charges, Mark is quite happy with this deal and begins to celebrate by calling for champagne, but the celebration comes to a swift and bitter end when Esquema states calmly yet confidently adds, “There is one other condition…your wife.” At this point, Mark predictably goes completely berserk and begins shouting obscenities at the protagonist, who responds by calmly and quietly exiting the room while his somewhat unhinged adversary continues to scream his head off.  After all, Mark cannot believe that Esquema would have the gall to imagine that immaculate blonde Aryan beauty Ella would be interested in a horribly disfigured third world gangster, even if he is a politician and thus knows that every pussy has a price. When Alan informs his comrade that he no longer wants him to kill Mark, Javier gets annoyed and remarks, “Nothing like love to screw up a good thing,” though the two longtime friends part on happy terms.  During a classically Schrader-esque of keen cultural cynicism where the auteur more or less likens American capitalism and U.S. political systems to that of a third world whorehouse, Esquema recommends that Latino killer Javier, who is probably an illegal alien, donate money to a college since it might earn him an honorary doctorate and a school building being named after him.

After coming up with the decision to obtain a new “all-American identity,” Alan picks up Ella and the two head to the a remote wooded area where they start a new life in a log cabin. Naturally, as a man that has lost virtually everything, including his wife, career, dignity, and pretty much his entire life, Mark has nothing left to live for and thus has his lawyer find Alan and Ella’s whereabouts so that he can exact his revenge. Indeed, Alan gets quite the shock when he gets out of the shower one day and discovers that Mark has broken into his cabin and has come to kill him, Ella, and himself. In regard to his planned bizarre love triangle oriented murder-suicide pact, Mark states to Alan in a joyously deranged fashion after shooting him in the thigh, “We’re all gonna die for love. See? I’m a romantic, too.” When the protagonist dares to vocally doubt Mark’s love for Ella, the romantically autistic antagonist becomes exceedingly enraged, shoves his gun in Alan’s face, and shouts, “How dare you judge me, you lovesick little nobody! I love her in my own way!” When Alan retorts, “Love is not your own way. It’s either pure…or selfish,” Mark asks the protagonist if his love is “pure” and when he affirmatively replies “yes,” the sadistic villain shoots him in the neck and then goes outside to wait for Ella. When Mark confronts Ella and implies that he has killed Alan, the heroine cries, “I will not lose him.” Although Ella attempts to go inside the cabin to see if Alan is ok, Mark grabs her, puts a gun to her head, and then demands that she say “I love you” one more time before he kills her. Luckily, before her lovelorn hubby can blow her brains out, Alan emerges from the cabin and begins brutally bashing Mark’s head into a cement floor until he is dead. In the end, Ella attempts to keep Alan conscious while he is succumbing to his wounds by reminding him about how they first met. In the end after a series of flashback scenes, the film concludes with protagonists' saying the titular words: “Forever Mine” in what is ultimately a beauteously bittersweet conclusion to a beauteously bittersweet movie.




While Forever Mine concludes in almost infuriating ambiguity, auteur Schrader has hinted that the protagonist dies in the end, or as he stated in the audio commentary for the MGM DVD release of the film, “If anyone would ask me, ‘Did he live or did he die?,’ I would always say, ‘Well, he lives…in her memory,’ which I guess is an appropriately romantic answer for this oddly romantic film.” Indeed, “oddly romantic” is a pretty good way to describe the film, especially considering the reputation of the man that wrote and directed it, yet despite it’s sometimes almost oneiric fairytale essence, Schrader’s decadently aesthetically pleasing dark romance reveals more insights in regard to the absurdities of love and it’s oftentimes senselessly tragic consequences than probably any of the shiksa-obsessed films that superlatively sexually dysfunctional Hebraic romcom maestro Woody Allen has ever made.  Although oftentimes exquisitely ethereal in terms of visuals, Forever Mine is hardly a cinematic work that attempts to romanticize the pangs and perils of romance, as the film is like a sensitively written love letter that was penned with the blood of a stillborn babe and placed in a pretty pink envelope that is laced with anthrax and cheap Cuban cologne. Indeed, to any sane male, the love affair depicted in Schrader’s film would seem like a deadly curse, as if the protagonist came under the spell of an inordinately gorgeous autistic witch that was not even totally conscious of her own sinisterly seductive sexual powers, thereupon making her all the more deleterious to her male victims.  While Gretchen Mol's character might have a face and body that suggests she is an immaculate angel that sired with god's greatest materials, I would go so far as to argue that she is actually that true villain of the film, as a sort of bourgeois femme fatale who destroys both the protagonist and antagonist and whose treacherous and manipulative actions against both of these characters is inspired solely by her desire to avoid even the most mild of emotional and material discomforts.  Undoubtedly, there is no question that Schrader thinks very little of the film heroine as he makes a joke in his audio commentary where he points out the fact that the “ice queen” is ironically standing next to a polar bear statue. Of course, the brilliance of Schrader’s film is that he never dares to demonize or ridicule the heroine, but instead subtly depicts how, due to pathological passivity and supreme cowardice, she more or less stands by and watches as her one-true-love is destroyed. Not surprisingly, it is only in the end when the protagonist has become much wealthier than her husband that the heroine finally agrees to ditch her jail-bound hubby and get with him, so I must admit that I felt a little bit of schadenfreude when said protagonist assumedly dies in the end and she is left with nothing but her own regret.




Notably, in her classic text The Manipulated Man (1971), antifeminist Jewess Esther Vilar has a fun little dictionary of sorts where she exposes what women, who typically delight in obfuscation, really mean when they say certain things. For example, in one decoding that certainly pertains to Forever Mine, Vilar claims that when a woman says, “A man must be able to protect me,” what she really means is, “A man must be able to spare me from all forms of discomfort.” Undoubtedly, this is one of the central conflicts of the film, as the heroine refuses to leave the husband she loathes for the man she that loves and has seemingly immaculate emotional and sexual compatibility with because she fears the prospect of poverty and, in turn, material discomfort, among other relatively petty things. Of course, this is one of the main innate timeless differences between men and women, as whereas a man is usually happy enough to just be with a woman that he loves, a woman always wants more and starts to loathe a man that has not dedicated his life solely to making her life easier. Another rather repellent feminine characteristic that the film highlights is the tendency of women to be more concerned with superficial appearances and the opinions of others than their and their lovers’ own personal happiness, as the the film’s rather vain and superficial heroine cannot bear the social repercussions of leaving her successful spouse for a poor young man with no reputation and instead stays in a completely loveless and childless marriage with a seemingly sociopathic political parasite whose wealth has been at least partially obtained via criminal means.  Not surprisingly, not once in the film does the heroine express guilt over the fact that her husband is a criminal except when he ostensibly kills the protagonist. In an assumed attempt to spare herself personal guilt, the heroine also makes the fatal mistake of coercing her lover into not killing her scumbag spouse, thus giving said scumbag spouse the opportunity to kill both him and her. In short, Forever Mine is a film where love-crushes-all as a sweetly venomous and sometimes elegantly cynical cinematic work where an adulterous dame who married for money incites a fourteen year blood feud between two very different men that ends with both of their violent premature demises.




While I was only somewhat impressed when I originally watched Forever Mine nearly a decade ago, I have discovered with my recent re-watching of it that, like many of Schrader’s films, it is a subtly intricate flick that made me come to the realization that its creator is a mentally accursed man that sees murder-suicide pacts and deadly game of cross-class adultery as deeply romantic, but I guess one should not expect anything less from the man that created the autobiographical antihero of Travis Bickle. I also recently came to the bitter and slightly embarrassing realization that I could empathize with the film's male protagonist in his self-destructive and masochistic quest to devout all to the love of his life. Like the film’s protagonist, there is a certain woman in my life that I probably should loathe, but I just cannot find it in me, at least for long.  While I have been in relationships with various beautiful women, I can safely say that I only still love one of them and I still pretty much have the same exact feelings for her that I have always had.  Thankfully, unlike the film's protagonist and a lot of men in general, I do not take comfort in being some bitch's bitch, or as Vilar noted in regard to the self-delusion that many men have when it comes to marriages and romantic relationships, “As a result of ‘love,’ man is able to hide his cowardly self-deception behind a smoke screen of sentiment. He is able to make himself believe that his senseless enslavement to woman and her hostages is more than an act of honor, it has a higher purpose. He is entirely happy in his role as a slave and has arrived at the goal he has so long desire.” Undoubtedly, if there is anything to learn by watching Forever Mine, it is that one should never trust any woman, especially the sort that regularly lies and cheats on her husband.  Additionally, any woman that marries a man that she does not love wholly deserves the abject metaphysical misery and grand sexual dissatisfaction that typically accompanies such a sham relationship, as she has robbed both herself and her spouse of true happiness due to both greed and/or cowardice.



-Ty E

Monday, April 25, 2016

Under the Volcano




While I certainly feel accursed in other ways, I feel quite blessed that I am more or less allergic to alcohol and thus have never succumbed to the distinctly malevolent metaphysical affliction of alcoholism, as I have a feeling that I would drink myself to death if I were a dipsomaniac since I am not the sort of person that does things halfway and would probably prefer to be perpetually drunk than to deal with hangovers and alcohol withdraw. On a more personal level, I have seen friends go from be cerebral and deeply thoughtful individuals to extroverted drunken retards and insufferable human excrement practically overnight as a result of becoming drunks, not to mention the various friends and family members I have know whose childhoods were ruined by disgusting boozer bastards, thus I have a low tolerance for liquid courage fetishism; be it from date-rape-inclined fratboys that rock out to the Dave Matthews Band or schizophrenic negro hobos that get aggressive if you decline to give them the change that they shamelessly beg for whilst polluting urban areas with their bottom-of-the-barrel social parasitism. In fact, I must confess that I absolutely loathe just about everything about alcohol and alcoholics, so naturally a film about a degenerate drunkard has to be pretty damn good for me to be able to even finish watching it, let alone consider it a notable cinematic work. Of course, Barbet Schroeder’s Barfly (1987) starring Mickey Rourke as the far-too-handsome alter-ego of perpetually shit-faced Ameri-kraut wordsmith Charles Bukowski is a fun novelty and Marco Ferreri’s delectably debauched ‘dirty realism’ adaptation Storie di ordinaria follia (1981) aka Tales of Ordinary Madness is even better, but both of these films utilize lowlife dark humor as a means to make the rather dejecting material easier to swallow without vomiting in disgust. In a somewhat difference fashion, Bavarian auteur Herbert Achternbusch's darkly yet mirthfully melancholic absurdist comedies like Bierkampf (1977) aka Beer Chase and Das letzte Loch (1981) aka The Last Hole manage to somewhat distance the viewer from the true severity ugliness of kraut carousers, who sometimes seem demonically possessed by drink, by incorporating humor. Undoubtedly, Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s early masterpiece Händler der vier Jahreszeiten (1971) aka The Merchant of Four Seasons—a film loosely based on the German auteur's tragic loser uncle—features one of the best and most harrowing depictions of a drunk ever committed to celluloid to the point where it makes the dipsomaniac as portrayed by Robert Stack in the director’s mentor Douglas Sirk’s Written on the Wind (1956) seem like a bad Jim Carey sketch by comparison. Aside from Fassbinder’s flick, I would have to say one of the greatest and most entrancingly devastating depicts of rampant drunkenness is Hollywood maverick John Huston’s antepenultimate feature Under the Volcano (1984) starring English actor Albert Finney in arguably the greatest performance of his career as an eloquently erratic drunkard who has not put down the bottle once ever since his much younger and more handsome half-American bastard of a half-brother had a lurid love affair with his gorgeous actress wife. Based on the semi-autobiographical 1947 novel of the same name written by tragic alcohol-addled Englishman(child) Malcolm Lowry, the film has the perfect setting for a cinematic work with a protagonist that has given up on life and is about to die as it takes place in a small Mexican town during the Day of the Dead in 1938 on the eve of the Second World War. 




 As the lives of savage satirist and fabulist Ambrose Bierce, who completely disappeared while he was in his early 70s after traveling south of the border in 1913 to get first-hand experience of the Mexican Revolution and joining Pancho Villa's army, and junky queer William S. Burroughs, who ‘accidentally’ killed his second wife during a less than fortuitous game of ‘William Tell’ while living in Mexico City, clearly demonstrate, Mexico is a place that self-destructive, suicidal, and/or otherwise dysfunctional gringos travel to when they have given up on life and want to gamble with their mortality.  Notably Huston’s third and final film in a sort of unofficial Mexican trilogy following The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948) starring Humphrey Bogart and the director’s father Walter Huston and the tastefully trashy black-and-white Tennessee Williams adaptation The Night of the Iguana (1964), Under the Volcano is a tale of exotic and oftentimes eccentric self-obliteration where a cultivated yet spiritually vacant and deracinated Englishman that is quite fond of noble savages learns the hard way that good manners, elegance, and refinement only go so far when you’re dealing with a group of people who are not beneath shooting and killing their best amigo during an argument over the prowess of a young matador.  Not unlike French libertine poet Arthur Rimbaud, the emotionally perturbed protagonist is a perennial drunken wanderer that is just as every bit rude and crude as he is refined and charismatic, as a sort of fallen spiritual aristocrat and upperclass wino that has decided that self-imposed exile in a strange foreign land that resembles both heaven and hell is the only appropriate existence for a foredoomed fellow like himself with nothing to lose to live. Quite fittingly shot by veteran Mexican cinematographer Gabriel Figueroa, who began his career shooting Sergei M. Eisenstein’s unfinished masterpiece ¡Que viva Mexico! (1932)—a film that is also set partly during the Day of the Dead and features a somewhat paganistic portrayal of Mexicans—Under the Volcano is, not unlike various films by Huston's fellow rough old hard-ass Hollywood maverick Sam Peckinpah, especially Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia (1974), a beauteously bleak and nihilistic love letter to a culturally conflicted yet deeply spiritual third world hellhole that the gringo may have officially created and still somewhat controls but ultimately still very much contains the spirit of human-sacrificing Aztecs that once ruled the land.  Featuring a spiritually castrated loser who has lost both his soul and purpose in life and thus has replaced them with the devil's mouthwash, Huston's film is an almost sometimes infuriating tragedy that reveals in a somewhat subtle way how it is usually the most broken and hopeless of individuals that fall into the (anti)solacing metaphysical purgatory of alcoholism.  In its depiction of a superficially dignified dipsomaniacal degenerate that is driven to drink due to both his incapacity to grieve and stop loving the woman that betrayed him, I think Under the Volcano also says a lot about Huston and might arguably be his most auteurist oriented cinematic work.




 As someone that has never really cared for that virtual human booger Bogart and thus have little affection for the filmmaker's early classic films The Maltese Falcon (1941) and The African Queen (1951), I can state without even the slightest degree of hesitation that I believe Huston directed his greatest, most original, and subversive films during his golden years, which is somewhat ironic considering he assembled some of his most astonishingly horrendous cinematic works during the same exact period. Indeed, his commissioned works like wholly worthless horror-thriller Phobia (1980) and the WWII POW soccer flick Victory (1981) seem like they could have been directed by the worst of Roger Corman-trained for-hire hacks. According to Orson Welles, who starred in a couple of the Huston’s films (and vice versa), the filmmaker did not even bother to actually direct a number of his films and instead he would coerce someone else to do it for him, or as the Citizen Kane director stated to Henry Jaglom during a conversation featured in the book My Lunches With Orson (2013), “What you don’t understand is that he [Huston] doesn’t [direct his films]. He just knows how to make a picture without directing it. He just sits and lets the choreographer or somebody else do it. He stays up and plays poker all night, and when he’s shooting, that’s when he’s resting.”

Of course, despite his early training as both a fine painter in Paris and writer (notably, German-American iconoclast H. L. Mencken bought two of his early stories for his popular magazine American Mercury), Huston never considered himself an auteur and virtually all of his greatest films are adaptations of popular novels, including his last three films: Wise Blood (1979), Under the Volcano, and The Dead (1987). Personally, my favorite Huston film is his almost sadistically sardonic Flannery O'Connor adaptation Wise Blood, which feels like it was directed by a young rebellious anti-Hollywood auteur and not an old golden age studio filmmaker that was in his 70s. Aside from being unquestionably my second favorite Huston flick, Under the Volcano is the film that I regard as the director’s most overtly personal and auteur orientated cinematic work, even if lead actor Albert Finney’s true tour-de-force performance is indubitably the most potent and memorable aspect of the entire film (notably, Huston would state of the actor’s performance, “I think it's the finest performance I have ever witnessed, let alone directed”). In fact, Finney’s performance is so great as a jovially nihilistic alcoholic (ex)consul that many people seem to believe that the actor was actually thoroughly shit-faced during the filming, which he most certainly was not. 




 Beginning with an unforgettable chiaroscuro opening sequence that was actually directed by the director’s then-21-year-old-son Danny Huston (who went on to be a Hollywood actor and sometimes director and who gave his own Finney-esque tour-de-force performance in Bernard Rose’s underrated Tolstoy update Ivansxtc (2000)) featuring dancing Day of the Dead skeleton marionettes, the film then cuts to a shot of a volcano juxtaposed with an title reading, “Cuernavaca, Mexico – November 1, 1938 – The Day of the Dead.”  Despite the fact that he has quit his job as the British consul of the area, protagonist Geoffrey Firmin (Albert Finney) has decided to stay in Mexico as he rather enjoys the scenic region and its equally exotic people, even though most of the locals seem to find him to be quite inexplicable and see him as either a deranged old gringo or a drunken old fool with too much money (to his credit, the protagonist sometimes appeases the many beggars that seem to be always bothering him).  While he can barely communicate with many of these individuals in linguistic terms, Geoffrey has some bizarre wordless relationships with rather eccentric folks, including an elderly Indian peasant woman that plays dominoes with an alcoholic chicken (in fact, said elderly Indian peasant woman attempts to save the protagonist's life towards the end of the film, but he fails to take heed of her rather clear warning).

The film begins the night before the Day of the Dead and Geoffrey spends most of the evening strolling around in the dark in black sunglasses while a stray dog that he lovingly feeds follows him around town. The only local that Geoffrey has any sort of truly meaningful friendship with that involves actual deep conversations is a charming old Mestizo chap named Dr. Vigil (Ignacio López Tarso), who may be a man of science but he seems to be just as supremely superstitious as every other Mexican in the area.  Indeed, when the protagonist states, “Only in Mexico is death an occasion for laughter,” Dr. Vigil unwittingly illustrates the innate difference in terms of mindsets between Mexicans and ungodly Anglo-Saxons by replying, “On the Day of the Dead, when their spirits come back to us…the road from heaven must be made – made easy…and not slippery with tears.” Of course, being a perpetually drunk nihilist of sorts who is fed up with everything about his life except alcohol, Geoffrey is not exactly your typical Anglo as reflected in remarks like, “How, unless you drink as I do, can you hope to understand the beauty of an old Indian woman playing dominoes with a chicken?” Likewise, when a friend of Dr. Vigil describes the plot of Karl Freund’s classic Maurice Renard adaptation Mad Love (1935) aka The Hands of Orlac and how a character in the film named Stephen Orlac becomes extremely upset and sorry that the new hands he received in a transplant are responsible for killing people against his will, Geoffrey remarks with a certain poetic confidence, “There are things for which one cannot apologize,” which ultimately prove to be weighty words if considered in the context of the romantic betrayal that his (ex)wife Yvonne (Jacqueline Bisset) and half-brother Hugh (Anthony Andrews) committed against him.  Naturally, as the losing party of a bizarre love triangle involving two much younger and more attractive individuals, Geoffrey is consumed with a sort of undying sense of despair that seems to be reminding him that death is not too far away.




 On the night before the Day of the Dead when locals are getting good and wasted while hanging up flashy traditional holiday decorations, Geoffrey follows Dr. Vigil to a church and, despite being an innately irreligious chap, prays to Mary the Blessed Virgin that his estranged wife will come back to him, stating during a rare moment where he totally submits to vulnerability, “I’m dying without you. Come back to me, Yvonne,” which ultimately prove to be somewhat ironic words considering how the protagonist ends up at the conclusion of the film. In what Dr. Vigil later sincerely describes as a “miracle,” Yvonne does indeed return the next day, but it is hardly a happy reunion, as Geoffrey is trapped in a tequila-fueled inward pandemonium and lacks the capacity to embrace her the same way he did when they were once happily married together because he cannot get over the fact that she betrayed him and had a lurid love affair with his little half-brother Hugh, who also seems to be still in love with her as his behavior will demonstrate. Indeed, despite divorcing him in a rather cold and unexpected way without even giving him any forewarning, Yvonne still believes that she is in love with Geoffrey and has yet to even take her wedding ring off, hence why she has traveled all the way to the fiery bowels of Mexico to see and reconcile with him.

When Yvonne unexpectedly arrives at a bar where the protagonist is telling a dubious story about how he was the commander of a ship named S.S. Samaritan during World War I and how he received a prestigious medal for capturing an enemy ship, even though he was also court-martialed for ostensibly incinerating seven German officers in a furnace, Geoffrey literally cannot believe his eyes upon seeing her and he only realizes it is really her and not a hallucination after continuing to tell his story and taking a second hard look in what is indubitably a brilliant Hustonian moment that demonstrates that the director has a good grasp of the pathetic perpetual delirium that is the dipsomaniacal mind. While one would expect that a man that prayed to the Mother Mary to bring his estranged wife back would immediately engage in a long, passionate, and otherworldly orgasmic love session with their estranged beloved within minutes, if not seconds, of being reunited with her, Geoffrey is largely evasive and does not do much more than awkwardly kiss her, even though Yvonne gets somewhat aggressive and forces him to get in bed with her. While Geoffrey joins Yvonne in bed, he cannot seem to restore the love and affection he once had for her and soon finds an excuse to exit the room so that he can get even drunker. Needless to say, as the films progresses, Geoffrey only gets all the more intoxicated and, in turn, irrational and belligerent, among other things. Rather unfortunately, like most addicts, Geoffrey has unwittingly accursed his love ones and will ultimately bring them down with him in what is ultimately one of the most tragically anti-romantic endings in cinema history. 




 It is not clear what the exact circumstances were in regard to the adulterous affair between Yvonne and Hugh, but what is clear is that it left Geoffrey an irreparably broken man who, despite his desire to move on with his life, unfortunately lacks the capacity to forgive both of them. Of course, naturally the viewer strongly suspects that the affair was partly the result of Geoffrey’s belligerent drinking. After all, it is much easier to both sexually and emotionally satisfy a woman when you’re not drunk off your ass all the time, on top of the fact that the protagonist would have been more aware of the relationship between his wife and brother had he not been perpetually inebriated (indeed, while MTV and shitty Hollywood comedies love linking sex and alcohol together like peas and carrots, alcoholism oftentimes causes sexual impotence in men). Undoubtedly, as a younger and handsomer chap with a talent for music, poetry, and showing off like a fearless jackass, Hugh has certain attractive qualities that his somewhat more docile brother lacks, not to mention the fact that he is much closer in age to Yvonne. In fact, defeatist cynic Geoffrey is more or less the total opposite of Hugh, who has a thirst for life instead of drink and spends much of his time traveling around the world as a communist journalist who fought on the side of the Republicans during the Spanish Civil War (at one point, he lovingly describes a British comrade that perished in the war as, “a communist…approximately the best man I ever met”). While ex-consul Geoffrey is certainly no patriot, let alone a fascist, he is far too wise and cynical to have faith in the big Marxist scam. Naturally, Geoffrey’s lack of political idealism does not stop him from mocking a German Attaché named Herr Krausberg (Günter Meisner of Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory (1971) and Agustí Villaronga’s Tras el cristal (1986) aka In a Glass Cage) by alluding to Nazi murders and screaming in a ballroom full of tons of people, “Corpses must be transported by express. Each of these express corpses…must be accompanied by a first-class passenger. Now, let’s supposed, uh, the treaty fails and it’s bloody Armageddon. Just thinks of it. Railways stand to make a fortune [...] The whole world will learn to laugh at the sight of stinking cadavers. Oh, ha! Ha! Ha! Bloody, ha! Ha! Ha!” As a favor to his brother, Geoffrey also has the gall to ask Herr Krausberg if his Hitlerite homeboys are responsible for funding a Mexican fascist group called the Sinarquistas (National Synarchist Union). Rather unfortunately, Geoffrey will eventually bump into members of the Sinarquistas at a remote rural bar-cum-brothel on an insanely ill-fated night when he is especially erratic and emotional in his self-annihilating inebriation, henceforth leading to catastrophic consequences for both him and his beloved. 




 As can be expected from a seemingly forsaken boozer that is still grieving over the fact that his more youthful and positive half-brother defiled his wife, Geoffrey only gets all the more unpredictably unhinged in his drunkenness when brother Hugh randomly shows up at his home no long after Yvonne arrives. In one rather bizarre scene that is just about as uncomfortable as it is comical, especially considering the circumstances, both Yvonne and Hugh strip Geoffrey naked and try to get him to snap out of his drunkenness by forcing him into a shower and shaving him, but they of course have next to nil luck in their active attempt to get the protagonist to figuratively crawl out of his whisky bottle. Still, Geoffrey seems initially excited about roaming around town during the Day of the Dead with his half-bro and high-class whore of a wife, even though he does somewhat cruel things to embarrass them like sarcastically yelling, “Hugh. Where are you? Where can the young pup be? Hugh! An emissary calls. The Consul of Cuckold’s Haven. Come and give thou wife a ‘welcome back’ kiss.” Needless to say, Hugh and Yvonne try their best to ignore these obscene drunken outbursts, even if they are no match for the cuckolded (ex)consul’s scathingly sardonic wit. Every so often, Geoffrey reveals the sensitive loving man that is hidden behind his mask of deranged dipsomania by randomly stating things like, “No si puede vivir sin amar.” When Yvonne asks her (ex)husband to translate what he said, Geoffrey replies in a similarly tender yet nonchalant fashion, “One cannot live without love,” but nothing else is said about the matter, as if the characters are shocked by the perturbed protagonist’s fleeting moment of pure humanity. Of course, the viewer certainly suspects that Geoffrey means what he says and is not just being a pretentious would-be-poetic conman like his pompous brother, as his current sad state of internal purgatory is a direct result of the fact that his romantic relationship with a woman he still deeply loves has been irreparably despoiled, hence the tragedy of both the character and the story as a whole. 




 While Hugh is being carried around and practically worshiped by a large crowd of Mexicans after he randomly jumps into a bullfighting pit and proves that, despite being a fairly effete gringo, he has immaculate matador skills, Yvonne seizes the opportunity to attempt to talk Geoffrey into starting over again with her, stating in an extremely impassioned fashion, “Listen, Geoffrey. There’s nothing holding us here any longer. We can start again.” While Geoffrey initially seems excited about the idea and discusses moving to a rural area in the north where they can socialize with Eskimos and “escape into the wilderness like good old William Blackstone,” things eventually get ugly and the protagonist states with a certain stereotypically upper-class British refined seething hatred while his brother is also in their company, “when Brother Hugh comes on a visit…fresh from his heroics in, uh, Spain or wherever…I’ll show proper Eskimo hospitality and give him my wife…to bed down with during the cold northern night.” At this point, Yvonne breaks down and states while shaking and on the verge of sobbing terribly, “Geoffrey. Geoffrey, I’ve come…cr–crawling back. What m-more can I do? Let me be your wife,” but of course the compulsively cynical protagonist is unimpressed with his lady’s fresh tears. When Hugh gets the nerve to ask him, “Geoff, what possesses you?,” the protagonist stoically replies, “Sobriety, I’m afraid. Too much moderation. I need drink desperately. Get my balance back.” Undoubtedly, this rather revealing scene gets most disturbing when Geoffrey proceeds to ignore both Hugh and Yvonne and has a very irritable conversation with himself while they are both still in his company and attempting to get his attention, thus revealing his hopeless case of internal torment.  Indeed, while Yvonne and Hugh watch on with great horror, Geoffrey states to himself, “When has she ever been a wife to me? Where are the children I might have had…that drowned to the rattling – of a thousand douche bags? Hugh, on the threshold of paradise…puffing over her gills like a codfish, veins like a racehorse…prime as a goat, hot as a monkey, salt as a wolf in pride. Let them wallow here in their bliss with my blessing. Hell’s…my preference. I choose hell [chuckles] Hell is my natural habitat.” After deciding that he will submit to eternal metaphysical misery, Geoffrey leaves his bastard brother and treacherous spouse and heads to a nearby jungle to make his way to an inordinately seedy bar near a volcano where he will fully embrace a sort of backwoods third world hell and ultimately succeed in a manner that he probably never felt was possible before. 




 At the beginning of the film, Geoffrey states to his friend Dr. Vigil, “No Mescal. I’d go thirsty before drinking Mescal,” yet by the end of the film he cannot get enough of the “tequila of the poor.” In fact, the protagonist’s progressive deterioration is symbolically reflected by the fact that he goes from drinking whisky to tequila to mescal. Of course, as can expected from an erratic drunkard that is used to drinking more refined alcoholic beverages, the less than merry mestizo favorite of mescal gets Geoffrey into serious trouble that no amount of British charm can get him out of, especially when talking to murderous Mexican thugs that are far from literate in their own indigenous language. Indeed, when the protagonist arrives at a supremely sleazy rural bar named ‘El Farolito’ where an intense cockfight is going on right outside not far from the entrance door, he is almost immediately bombarded by a supremely slimy scheming dwarf pimp (José René Ruiz aka Rene Ruiz ‘Tun-Tun’), who immediately advertises his rather unhealthy and seemingly highly diseased human meat menu, which includes a morbidly obsess mestizo beastess, grotesque overweight tranny that makes John Waters' muse Divine seem like Debbie Harry by comparison in terms of sex appeal and overall daintiness, and even a little beaner boy. While Geoffrey initially turns down the humorously sinister dwarf’s offer to be a satisfied carnal customer, his mind somewhat changes when he guzzles down a couple shots of mescal and proceeds to read letters from Yvonne that were wrongly delivered to the backwards bar. Indeed, while lurking in the darkness by himself like a mad scientist on the brink of a insidious discovery and readings Yvonne’s carefully chosen words, “Geoffrey, why don’t you answer me? If you no longer love me and do not want me to come back to you…will you not write and tell me so? It is your silence that frightens me. What has happened to our hearts? Don’t we owe it to ourselves…to that self we created apart from us…to try again. I am sorry. I am so sorry,” the protagonist eventually becomes bitterly enraged and shouts out loud while in a state of almost demonically possessed contempt, “Not enough. Not enough. It’s not possible. Not… in this world.” At this point, Geoffrey is vulnerable enough to embrace the dwarf’s best looking whore (who is certainly no prize, but she does have nice tits) to a backroom where they have what seems to be fairly lackluster and equally dejecting sex. 




After exiting the mescal-marinated Latina's (anti)love chamber, Geoffrey looks like a defeated man and refuses to pay the mischievous dwarf more money when he dubiously asks him for extra payment, even though the protagonist has already paid both the girl and the midget for what is probably the worst and most distinctly dissatisfying sex of his entire pathetic life. After Geoffrey refuses to pay the extra money, the dwarf seems satisfied enough and then more or less reveals to the protagonist that he has just probably contracted an STD by stating, “Okay, my England Man. No worry for you. Maria, she very clean. If you need doctor, I send all my amigos to this man. Good man doctor. Here. Come on.”  Indeed, the midget shocks the protagonist by handing him a business card for a local doctor that specializes in STDs.  Unbeknownst to Geoffrey, while he was busy getting laid by a sub-lumpenprole Latina whose vag is probably less sanitary than a gay bathhouse in San Francisco during the early 1980s, Yvonne was standing outside the door crying after the dick-headed dwarf revealed to her in a rather grotesque way that her hubby was being sexually serviced by a supremely skanky spick chick. When Geoffrey dares to insult the degenerate dwarf after he incessantly berates an American bar patron that claims Mozart was responsible for writing the bible, he soon finds himself being by bullied by the little man’s Sinarquista comrades. Aside from one of them accusing him of attempting to steal his horses (even though said horse was actually stolen from an Indian that the Sinarquistas killed earlier that day), the clearly racially mongrelized mestizo fascists falsely accuse him of being a spy, Al Capone, Leon Trotsky, and Russian Jew, among other things. Indeed, in broken English, one of the men hilariously asks Geoffrey, “You Bolshevik prick? Anticristo Jew?” Of course, there is only so much one man can take and Geoffrey eventually goes ballistic and begins waving a machete at his murderously malicious Mexican tormentors, thereupon committing the unpardonable act of threatening their much valued machismo prowess in the process. Needless to say, one of the Sinarquista banditos eventually shoots Geoffrey and the others subsequently join. Rather unfortunately, Yvonne becomes fearful when she hears the gunshots while walking through the woods and begins running back to the bar in the rain, only to be instantly killed when she is trampled by her hubby’s killer’s horse. Naturally, when Hugh soon finds Yvonne’s lifeless body, he completely breaks down, thus hinting that he did indeed love his brother's wife. Meanwhile, Geoffrey humorously states while covered in mud and succumbing to his wounds as rain drops from the sky, “What a…dingy way to die,” thereupon demonstrating that, even in his last dying moments, the protagonist never shed his razor sharp wit. 




 Arguably the first and last great cinematic semi-masterpiece in the spirit of the so-called ‘Lost Generation,’ Under the Volcano certainly provides ample reason as to why director John Huston was once called, “cinema's Ernest Hemingway” by British film magazine editor Ian Freer.  Described by screenwriter Guy Gallo (who, for whatever reason, never worked on another film) as a “Tragedy of Failed Intention,” the film somewhat cleverly interweaves the failure of a man to reconcile with his estranged wife and little brother with the failure of the West to avoid another World War and, in turn, the death of the British Empire and the overall destruction of the Occident as a whole. In that sense, one could argue that whereas Geoffrey is symbolic self-destructive nihilist Lost Generation types like Harry Crosby and Hart Crane who had completely given up on any semblance of a normal life or a bright future and thus had completely embraced their personal inner demons and and succumbed to hedonistic self-obliteration, Hugh is symbolic of the ridiculously naïve and idiotically idealistic leftists like Hemingway, Isadora Duncan, and even Huston himself who somehow absurdly believed that the revamping of the Occident with a communist or far-left systems would result in a sort of immaculate atheist utopia that would save civilization from complete capitulation. Of course, in its depiction of the protagonist being senselessly murdered by Nazi-backed Sinarquista thugs (it should be noted that in real-life, the National Synarchist Union, which still exists today, is a Roman Catholic extreme right group that had little interaction with the Nazis and preached hatred against Anglo-Saxons), Huston’s film, like most mainstream and Hollywood sources, uses the Third Reich as a convenient scapegoat for the death of the West, as if the British, the Soviet Union (and communist movements in general), Pan-Slavism, Zionism, and the culturally and economically cuckolding American occupiers did not play crucial roles in destroying every single European empire and turning Europa into the stinking and rotting multi(cult)tural dystopian anti-imperium that it is today, but I digress. 




 In her less than favorable and even less insightful review of the film, emotionally erratic Jewess Pauline Kael complained regarding Under the Volcano and its male lead, “For the movie to mean anything resembling the novel, we would have to see something of what Firmin—with his psyched-up consciousness—perceives. But all that it does is take a literal approach to the novel, as if it were no more than an account of the final binge of a drunk who becomes suicidally careless and gets himself killed […] Finney can’t help making us aware that he’s giving the role more than his best shot—that he’s pushing too hard (frequently in closeup), and overusing his facial muscles […] the movie has a deep-toned flossy and ‘artistic’ clarity and a peculiarly literary tone—the dialogue doesn’t sound like living people talking.” Aside from Kael's complete failure to sees its references to the Lost Generations and its allusions to the apocalyptic disaster that was the Second World War, she gives the strong impression that she only watched about 15 minutes or so of the film and then had one of her groveling acolytes tell her about what happens during the rest of the movie so that she could write a review and meet a deadline for her column in The New Yorker. Personally, I think filmmaker Rian Johnson, who is certainly no master auteur himself (to his grand discredit, he is the writer and director of the upcoming big budget toy commercial Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)), demonstrated that he had a much better understanding of the film and Finney’s performance than Kael when he stated in Robert K. Elder’s The Best Film You've Never Seen (2013), “…[UNDER THE VOLCANO] really does draw you into this feeling; it almost feels like you’re sinking into a swamp through the course of watching the film. You really feel yourself sinking deeper and deeper along with Finney into a mire of jealousy and a web of that place where love and loathing intersect.”  Indeed, it is no surprise that the film was far from a commercial success and is only remembered today by a certain breed of cinephile, as it radiates a certain haunting malignant unease as a less than pleasurable cinematic work where the patently perturbed protagonist tries in vain to mask his spiritual sickness and pangs of Sehnsucht and Weltschmerz with his incessant indulgence of hooch.  In other words, Under the Volcano is the closest that Huston ever got to directing something worthy of Ingmar Bergman.


Undoubtedly, while watching Huston's film, I could not help but recall an excerpt from C.G. Jung's imperative text Modern Man in Search of a Soul (1933) where he wrote, “I have a Red Indian friend who is the governor of a pueblo. When we were once speaking confidentially about the white man, he said to me: ‘We don't understand the whites; they are always wanting something—always restless—always looking for something. What is it? We don't know. We can't understand them. They have such sharp noses, such thing, cruel lips, such lines in their faces. We think they are all crazy.’” Indeed, Jung's words describe how I assume that the Mexicans felt about the protagonist in Huston's film, as the character more or less exemplifies the restless white man stereotype to an almost transcendental degree, but of course it somewhat makes perfect sense when one considers that he suffers from arguably Faustian man's greatest and most debilitating vice: alcoholism. Notably, Jung believed that chronic dipsomania was largely a spiritual affliction that could only be adequately cured if the addict had a life-changing “vital spiritual experience” that involved the alcoholic replacing the addiction with a strong religious conviction, hence the tendency for ex-addicts to become born-again Christians.  Certainly, if there is anything more disturbing than the film's protagonist's alcoholism, it is his all-consuming sense of defeatism and cynicism, hence why he was doomed to die drunk in the mud like a pig.  Of course, the worst aspect of this tragic conclusion is that, like many drunks, the protagonist never becomes aware of the fact that he unwittingly dooms the person he loves most to a similarly lowly fate.  Surely, I cannot think of another film that is as subtle yet blunt in terms of depicting the decidedly deleterious effects of alcoholism as Under the Volcano, which is thankfully never plagued by any phony preaching or proselytizing.  On the other hand, although the film is quite empathetic toward its accursed alcoholic protagonist, I would probably refraining from recommending it to anyone that attends Alcoholics Anonymous meetings.


 Ultimately, the general emotional essence of Under the Volcano reminds me of the lyrics from the song “Heartworms” by the British experimental industrial/electronic group Coil: “There's too much blood in my alcohol (Can't you get enough to numb me?) […] There's too much blood in my heart…In my heart (It's preventing coagulation)…I'm faithful that this stagnation's feeding my heartworms…Feeding the heartworms…The demons generally enter in through my ears…It all feels off of me…Ghosts vomit over me, over the old me…This knife's gonna make some young woman a fine husband.” In fact, Coil singer John Balance—a clearly troubled individual with a dubious fetish for scatology and Crowley—died at the premature age of 42 in late 2004 in a manner that even rivals the film’s protagonist's senseless demise in terms of being shockingly pathetic, as he perished in a freak accident after getting drunk and falling from a two story balcony at his Weston-super-Mare home that he shared with his longtime lover/band mate Christopherson Peter ‘Sleazy’ Christopherson (who himself died in his sleep under dubious circumstances in Bangkok in late 2010 at the age of 55). Undoubtedly, I see ‘Jhonn’ and ‘Sleazy’ as sort of contemporary kindred spirits to the character Geoffrey Firmin (and its creator Malcolm Lowry) as clearly gifted and cultivated artistic individuals of the perennially-seeking-but-never-finding wanderlust oriented sort that wholly embraced their inner demons and would never dare to defer hedonistic personal gratification, even if it would ultimately come at the hefty price of their lives. Of course, as seemingly coprophiliac Crowleyites and self-described “Born Again Pagans” that created truly grotesque and seemingly pederastic music videos with underage brown boys in Bangkok and were friends with such supreme degenerates like lifelong trust-fund junky William S. Burroughs and megalomaniacal meta-tranny Genesis P-orridge, the Coil members make the film’s protagonist seem like Sir Oswald Mosley by comparison in terms of sheer lack of restraint and are surely symbolic of the malignant social decay that is eating at the soul of what is left of Britannia. Incidentally, Coil has a song entitled “How To Destroy Angels,” which I think is an apt what to describe Geoffrey’s ultimate influence of his beauteous wife. Indeed, while one could argue that Under the Volcano somewhat feels like a sort of left-wing quasi-Spenglerian allegory for the seemingly self-destructively intoxicated old wino that is Western European man, the film is also a potent and nicely nuanced reminder about how Oscar Wilde’s famous line “Yet each man kills the thing he loves” is especially true when it comes to devout disciples of bacchanalian buffoonery. 



-Ty E