Wednesday, February 21, 2018

Twin Peaks: The Return




Somewhat recently, I realized a girl that I was considering dating was a dumb bitch and immediately stopped talking to her because she, in her preposterously pretentious ‘artiste’ glory, had the unmitigated gall to proclaim that David Lynch of all filmmakers was a “hack.” While I have my own strong criticisms regarding Lynch and have heard various attacks railed against him ranging from racism to perverted conservative misogyny (indeed, a dumb sapless soy boy named Jeff Johnson even dedicated an entire moronic book to this subject entitled Pervert in the Pulpit: Morality in the Works of David Lynch (2004)), it is nothing but patently absurd to claim that one of the most innately idiosyncratic auteur filmmakers to have ever suffered the grand artistic handicap of working in Hollywood makes something akin to dull and/or derivative celluloid bromide, especially in an aesthetically inverted era when anti-auteurs like Quentin Tarantino and Steven Spielberg—ostensible men with the emotional maturity and aesthetic refinement of bombastic little boys—are regarded by many professionals as some of the greatest filmmakers of all-time. Indeed, Lynch is one of the few cinematic artists and auteur filmmakers in all of cinema history that has managed to do the seemingly impossible by creating films that are both artistically original and geniunely entertaining, which he has indubitably demonstrated once again with his most recent and quite long-awaited 18-episode opus Twin Peaks: The Return (2017). Undoubtedly the perfect swansong to a rather singular and eclectic career, the ‘event series’ takes place 25 years after the original Twin Peaks was destroyed by the director’s social justice warrior writing partner Mark Frost, who essentially completely took over the show after the first season and, with the help of various relatively unknown hack writers, turned it into a pseudo-quirky unintentional self-parody while Lynch was working on his darkly romantic road movie Wild at Heart (1990). Admittedly, I was somewhat dubious of the reboot when I initially heard it was in the works because I found Lynch’s last feature Inland Empire (2006) to be quite literally unwatchable and assumed that the auteur was more interested in acting as an international propagandist for the pseudo-esoteric joke Transcendental Meditation (TM®) and pushing dubious projects like signature coffee beans and obscenely overpriced box-sets (e.g. The Lime Green Set) than testing the bounds of his artistic creativity and artistic prowess. In short, I was convinced that Lynch was high on his own supply and I still believe this to a certain extent, yet the latest and arguably greatest Twin Peaks season unquestionably demonstrates that elderly auteur still has artistic integrity and that he has not totally fried his brain on spiritually counterfeit TM® twaddle. 




 While various film academics have speculated that Lynch’s film influences include cinematic works ranging from Luis Buñuel’s classic surrealist short Un Chien Andalou (1929) to Robert Aldrich’s (anti)Spillane sci-fi-noir Kiss Me Deadly (1955) to Blake Edwards’ sexy sociopath thriller Experiment in Terror (1962), I can only assume after watching the new Twin Peaks that he has an intimate infatuation with both Peter Sellers’ strangely indelible performance in Hal Ashby’s sardonic dramedy Being There (1979) and Jeff Bridge's quite literally out-of-this-world role in John Carpenter's Starman (1984). Indeed, much to the chagrin of an Austrian friend of mine, the series’ lead character FBI Special Agent Dale Bartholomew Cooper spends the majority of the film in a meta-autistic Chance-cum-Starman-esque state, but such spastic and unhinged behavior is surely fitting when one considers the undeniable steady cultural and social degeneration of the United States since the original series was released. Portrayed by Lynch’s virtual cinematic doppelganger Kyle MacLachlan—an actor that is surely the living embodiment of the archetypal Lynchian hero—Agent Cooper was condemned to the absurdist pandemonium of the ‘Black Lodge’ at the end of the original series and spent the new couple decades there while an evil double associated with an equally evil swarthy spirited named ‘BOB’ assumed his identity in the real world and brought malefic misery to his friends and co-workers, including his beloved ‘Diane’ (who, although an unseen character on the original series, is fittingly depicted by longtime Lynch regular Laura Dern in the reboot).  While one would dare that they could read the filmmaker's mind, I think that t is obvious while watching Twin Peaks: The Return that Lynch believes that the world, especially the United States, has only gotten darker, uglier, stupider, and sicker since the brutal quasi-incestuous murder of buxom blonde teen Laura Palmer, hence the crucial need for a reboot. Indeed, forget the feel-good quirk of the lighter aspects of the original series, the new series has more in common with the prequel Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me (1992) and Lynch’s debut feature Eraserhead (1977). Of course, that does not mean that the new series does not have a number of hyper hilarious scenes that would probably cause the ghost of Buñuel to pop a massive boner. After all, only Lynch could bring hilarity to meth-addled single mothers, teenage drug overdoses, arm wrestling, insufferably dumb obese women, sinisterly stoic yet nonetheless insufferably nerdy gangster accountants, white trash assassins, fast food, highly homicidal bearded bums, braindead mechanics, deadly hit-and-runs involving children, mouthy pussy-peddling negresses, slot machines, gangsters, beef jerky, unclad and overweight headless middle-aged corpses, and cowardly yet extremely treacherous insurance salesmen, among other things. 



 Aside from Agent Cooper being imprisoned in the Black Lodge for a couple decades and then being violently thrown back into the real world in an annoying incapacitated meta-autistic form, various other iconic Twin Peak characters reveal that they are unwitting victims of an exceedingly evil yet largely inexplicable zeitgeist where youth seems to be largely a curse and older people, who are largely worn out and disillusioned with life, are no more wiser. For example, one-time-baby-diva Audrey Horne, who only briefly appears on the show, is now a fiercely frigid and somewhat overweight hag that is now married to a grotesque quasi-dwarf turd and may or may not be completely unhinged and living out nightmarish fantasies in a loony bin, not to mention the fact she spawned a literal demon seed from an involuntary carnal union with Agent Cooper’s devilish double. Additionally, Sheriff Harry S. Truman is so sick that he does not even appear on the show, heartthrob rebel James Hurley is now a pathetic creep that hangs out with lowclass Brits instead of hot ass chicks, Sarah Palmer is an unhinged recluse with deadly paranormal powers, the long-dead military mensch Major Garland Briggs makes a curious reappearance as a recently deceased unclad decapitated corpse, Margaret ‘Log Lady’ Lanterman is terminally ill, bad boy Bobby Briggs is now a divorced police detective, Shelly Johnson (and her ex-hubby Bobby) are plagued with a self-destructive dope-addled daughter, Jerry Horne has had one-too-many bad acid trips, Johnny Horne is even more retarded, and Mike Nelson is now a banal corporate bully instead of a cool teenage bully, among various other delightfully dejecting examples. Needless to say, the new characters on the show are no less forsaken and/or dysfunctional, though it seems that every urban area depicted outside of Twin Peaks is even more fucked up.  Indeed, unlike the original two series, the titular town is only one of a number of regions depicted in what is ultimately a more all-around epic and ambitious TV series that is just too damn good and artistic audacious to be described as a TV series.


 Undoubtedly, Lynch has always had very good instincts when it comes to casting characters as Twin Peaks: The Return, which features many intriguing cameos roles from people ranging from perennially gawky goombah hipster favorite Michael Cera to drop-dead-gorgeous guidette Monica Bellucci, surely demonstrates. For example, Lynch does a masterful job at using otherwise loathsome and insufferable actors in fitting roles, most notably semitic social justice warrior comedian Brett Gelman portraying a superlatively slimy Las Vegas casino manager that hilariously gets his seemingly nonexistent balls stomped in by a rather stern but nonetheless fair wop gangster. A uniquely unfunny kosher con-median that clearly demonstrated his hatred of freedom of speech and artistic expression by leading a sickeningly self-righteous hate campaign to get the show Million Dollar Extreme Presents: World Peace (2016)—a pleasantly politically incorrect experimental sketch comedy TV series that was successfully taken off the air due to complaints from various bitchy Hebraic individuals—removed from Adult Swim, gordo Gelman more or less represents everything that is particularly putridly loathsome and insufferable about Hollywood and is thus an immaculate symbol for the sort of enemy of creativity that Lynch has spent his entire career fighting against.  In short, only Lynch would have such deep intuition to cast the uniquely unfunny Hebraic hack in a strangely darkly humorous role that he was clearly born to play.


 Incidentally, Twin Peaks co-creator Mark Frost—a curious fellow that does not seem to have accomplished anything of notability outside his work with Lynch, who he has attached his name to like a starving maggot on a rancid pig corpse—is of a similarly intolerant neo-pinko pansy stripe as Gelman, as he can be regularly caught ranting and raving on Twitter about half-baked anti-Trump conspiracy theories and imaginary Nazis. For example, when Frost discovered via an ostensibly controversial New York Times article entitled A Voice of Hate in America’s Heartland that a mild-mannered Ohioan white nationalist named Tony Hovater had a Twin Peaks tattoo, he demonstrated his emotionally necrotic boomer-esque reactionary bent by declaring on Twitter, “Having now read [sic] the article, f*ck your bemused neutrality, NYT. As for the story’s ‘protagonist’: while you’re on your way to hell, lose the TWIN PEAKS tattoo, Nazi scum.” Rather humorously, Hovater responded rather stoically by asking “would you be willing to pay for my removals?,” but Frost did not have the testicular fortitude to reply to a big mean nasty natzi. While I do not know much about Hovater aside from the fact that he strangely seems to enjoy Seinfeld—arguably the most hopelessly Hebraic TV show ever created—I have read the article about him and I think it is safe to say that, in terms of sheer eccentricity of character and personality, he is a more apt fit for the Twin Peaks realm than Frost is, as he at least has an overall idiosyncratic essence while the TV writer seemingly seems like the stereotypical spiritually castrated white Hollywood leftist cuck shithead.

 Needless to say, I can only assume that Frost was responsible for writing a line in the new series where Lynch’s character FBI Deputy Director Gordon Cole says in support of David Duchovny’s tranny FBI Chief of Staff Denise Bryson in regard to the anti-tranny sentiments of certain fellow agents, “I told all of your colleagues, those clown comics, to fix their hearts or die.” Since Lynch has spent his entire career making apolitical and oftentimes politically incorrect films that various mainstream leftist film reviewers and academics are keen on complaining about, this glaring and completely out-of-place instance of insufferably silly virtue-signaling is undoubtedly an indelible stain on the series. Rather humorously, an article at the implicitly Jewish website The Forward stops just short of accusing the show of containing cryptic anti-Semitic tropes as indicated by the following excerpt, “Ben Horne, played by song-and-dance man Richard Beymer — who in fact played Peter in the film of THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK” — is the richest man in Twin Peaks, a nefarious, greedy character whose various business interests and relationships make him an on-again, off-again suspect in the murder of Laura Palmer. Ben’s flamboyant brother and business partner, played by David Patrick Kelly, is named Jerry, an obvious allusion to the real-life Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, the founders of Ben and Jerry’s ice cream.”  Of course, characters like the Horne brothers and various others hint that Lynch is, at the very least, subconsciously counter-kosher, which is a somewhat humorous prospect to consider since the auteur once collaborated with Mel Brooks—a mensch that really deserves credit for being one of the most hopelessly and intrinsically Hebraic filmmakers of all-time—on The Elephant Man (1980).




 One of the most intriguing aspects of Twin Peaks: The Return is that virtual every single young character is a total fuck-up, doped up, sociopathic, and/or completely irredeemable. For example, during a conversation between local cops in Twin Peaks, the viewer discovers that high school kids with cutesy names like “Little Denny Craig” are dropping like flies during classes via drug overdoses. In short, virtually every young woman needs to spend some time sporting a rusty scold's bridle and every young man deserves to get the shit kicked out of him at least half-a-dozen times, as there is no way these degenerate youths will live normal balanced lives. Indeed, Bobby Briggs and his ex-ladylove Shelly McCauley Briggs (aka ‘Shelly Johnson’) have a beauteous yet coke-addled and dangerously self-destructive blonde daughter named Becky Burnett (née Briggs) that lives in a shitty dilapidated trailer with her similarly dope-ridden husband Steven Burnett. A physically and emotionally unhinged tweaker and deadbeat philander that deals dope because he is too retarded to even be able to manage a successful job interview for an entry level office position, Steven ultimately seems to leave Becky a widow by the end of the series after seemingly blowing his brains out off-screen in a somewhat ambiguous scene that really underscores the character's decidedly dark drug-addled delirium. Needless to say, as the virtual literal demon seed of a sinister quasi-supernatural rape, Audrey Horne’s young career criminal son Richard Horne—a virtual modern-day Frank Booth that is depicted randomly grabbing a girl by the throat at a bar and stating to her in a demented fashion, “I’m gonna laugh when I fuck you, bitch”—is the ultimate unhinged piece of (sub)human millennial excrement par excellence. Aside from threatening to rape random girls at bars and beating and robbing his elderly grandmother while his retarded helpless uncle looks on in abject horror, little Richard also manages to kill a little kid in a hit-and-run accident and then proceeds to blame said kid for the incident.  In short, like many kids of his mostly worthless generation, Richard—a sassy sicko that was sown in hatred—should have never been born.

In fact, the only seemingly half-decent young character in the series is doofus Deputy Andy Brennan and his wife Lucy Brennan’s sole progeny ‘Wally Brando,’ who notably styles himself after Marlon Brando’s insanely iconic character in outlaw biker classic The Wild One (1953) which, incidentally, Lynch's buddy Monty ‘The Cowboy’ Montgomery co-directed a quasi-remake of entitled The Loveless (1982). Clearly rejecting the degenerate trends of his own zeitgeist but unfortunately lacking the charm, charisma, and beauteous handsomeness of his messiah Marlon, Wally, who is portrayed by goofy hipster guido Michael Cera of all people, is somewhat of a weirdo that spouts prosaic pseudo-metaphysical platitudes but he seems to ultimately have a good heart as indicated by his remark to Sheriff Frank Truman, “As you know, your brother Harry S. Truman is my godfather. I heard he is ill. I came to pay my respects to my godfather and extend my best wishes for his recovery, which I hope will be swift and painless. It's an honor to see you again. You know, my heart is always here with you, and these fine people, my parents, who I love so dearly, and I was in the area and I wanted to pay my respects […] My family, my friend, I have criss-crossed this great land of ours countless times. I hold the map of it here, in my heart, next to the joyful memories of the carefree days I spent as a young boy, here in your beautiful town of Twin Peaks. From Alexandria, Virginia, to Stockton, California, I think about Lewis, and his friend Clark, the first Caucasians to see this part of the world. Their footsteps have been the highways and byways of my days on the road. My shadow is always with me, sometimes ahead, sometimes behind, sometimes to the left, sometimes to the right, except on cloudy days, or at night […] My dharma is the road.” Of course, judging simply by the character Wally, it seems that Lynch believes that Transcendental Meditation is the only thing that can save contemporary youth from the all-destructive metaphysical hell of (post)modernity.  On the other hand, while Wally might be a good guy, he seems to be completely devoid of any sort of originality, which is typical of his generation.




 While Twin Peaks: The Return is unequivocally a visceral expression of Lynch’s thoughts and especially feelings about the modern world, the series, which is really more like one massive Miltonian art movie, it is also a virtual ‘David Lynch’s Greatest Hits’ in terms of its seemingly unending references to virtually all of the films and themes of the auteur’s career, including his pre-Hollywood avant-garde days. Indeed, with its various scenes of grotesque vomiting, the series recalls Lynch’s very first film Six Men Getting Sick (1966). In terms of aesthetically pleasing scenes of dark and seemingly endless phantom highways molested by intrusive headlights, it certainly tops Lost Highway (1997). As far as awkward and/or violent concert scenes in seedy bars that are inhabited by idiosyncratically dressed dipsomaniacs and degenerates, the series makes Wild at Heart (1990) seem a tad bit dated. For those that enjoy seeing arcane tools and preternatural evidence being used to solve devilishly Delphic mysteries, the new season of Twin Peaks makes Blue Velvet (1986) seem about as intriguingly enigmatic as Scooby-Doo: The Movie (2002), which is somewhat fitting since it features big goofy bastard Matthew Lillard in a performance that is a virtual antidote to the abject shame that he brought upon himself and stoners everywhere by portraying Shaggy Rogers. In fact, on top of delectably dark black-and-white scenes that bleed a certain Victorian decay like The Elephant Man (1980) and deathly dark Daguerreotype-like images comparable to the filmmaker's piece Premonition Following An Evil Deed for the anthology film Lumière and Company (1995), the series even has a little bit of a Dune (1980) aesthetic in terms of otherworldly sci-fi aesthetics.

 As far as I am concerned, Twin Peaks is Lynch’s answer to Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s Berlin Alexanderplatz (1980) as an inordinately epic auteurist miniseries and arguable magnum opus that manages to virtually immaculately sum up the filmmaker’s entire singular career and ultimately reveals that he has mastered his craft. In short, the series is the closest thing to a contemporary cinematic equivalent to Hieronymus Bosch’s classic triptych painting The Garden of Earthly Delights and Marcel Proust’s seven-volume literary masterpiece In Search of Lost Time (1913–1927) aka À la recherche du temps perdu. Indeed, while Twin Peaks might technically be pop entertainment that is meant for mass consumption, it is unequivocally the refined work of a mature yet nonetheless artistically fresh artist that has gone to great lengths to dive into the darkest abysses of his own soul and expose them for the entire world to see. As for Mr. Frost, he was clearly just riding on Lynch’s coattails, as if the sole reason he was hired by the studio was to make sure that the auteur did not create a cinematic work that was too bizarre or inexplicable.  Indeed, Frost is probably, at best, a glorified babysitter for America's favorite weirdo wunderkind.




 Somewhat ironically, fag boy Frost apparently borrowed the idea for the iconic ‘Black Lodge’ from British occultist Dion Fortune’s book Psychic Self-Defense (1930), which was heavily influenced by the work of Helena Blavatsky. Of course, anyone familiar with Ms. Blavatsky and her goofy esoteric (pseudo)religion Theosophy knows that she not only played a major influence on infamous proto-Nazi occultists like Guido von List and Rudolf von Sebottendorf, but was also a proud ‘racist’ and ‘antisemite’ that believed that most nonwhites were accursed ‘monads’ of the half-beastly untermensch sort. Naturally, it is no surprise that a seasoned ethno-masochistic like Frost would attempt to pass off quasi-Theosophical ideas as a form of ancient American Injun black magic despite the fact that the Black Lodge seems to contain nil Injuns (though, to be fair, the actor that played ‘Killer BOB,’ Frank Silva, was indeed part-Indian). Needless to say, despite featuring a great noble savage hero like Deputy Chief Hawk, Twin Peaks: The Return was attacked from various white liberal and non-white social justice eunuchs for lacking so-called ‘diversity.’ Naturally, such pathetic complaints seem patently preposterous when one considers that Lynch is one of the most innately and idiosyncratic white American filmmakers that has ever lived as a man whose very essence screams ‘eccentric wasp weirdo’ and whose art could have never been created by any so-called person of color. Undoubtedly, one of the things that makes Twin Peaks so great and relatively artistically organic is, not unlike Denis Villeneuve’s similarly nostalgia-inciting Blade Runner 2049 (2017), its relative racial homogeneity and lack of phony token ‘minority’ characters.  After all, affirmative action casting has never helped any film or TV show.




 Undoubtedly, out of all the various millennial-defecated articles accusing the show of racism, the most pointless and idiotic yet vaguely unintentionally insightful is a piece written by an outstandingly insipid brown beastess named Sezin Koehler with the ludicrously long and equally insipid title ‘TWIN PEAKS Is Overwhelmingly White, So Why do Fans of Color Keep Watching It?’ where a Chinese-American chick soundly states, “It makes sense to me. I’m from a small town that’s kind of old fashioned (no cellular towers, no chain stores…) so I found it to be very realistic. I don’t think it would have resonated as deeply with me if it were more diverse. I love to see diversity, especially racial, in the media but I feel like the lack of diversity was intentional in TWIN PEAKS and was necessary to portray a certain environment/atmosphere.” After all, no one would ever even dare to want to imagine a Twin Peaks with a negro Agent Cooper with cornrows or a swarthy black-haired and slant-eyed Laura Palmer, just as no one would ever entertain the prospect of a tiny yellow Chinaman portraying Melvin Van Peebles’ eponymous bad ass black buck character in Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song (1971) or neurotic kosher comedian Larry David portraying sadistic Aryan SS-Hauptsturmführer Amon Göth in Schindler's List (1993).

 Additionally, despite its dark underbelly, the titular town in the series seems like an almost fairytale-like utopia compared to most modern-day American towns and cities.  Like the quite cozy North Carolina town in Blue Velvet, Lynch clearly loves Twin Peaks and sees it as the gravest of tragedies that such an addictively quaint place has been plagued with a sinister undercurrent. Naturally, the show would be something entirely different were it set in a chocolate-colored Brooklyn ghetto or the fecal-flavored and AIDS-ridden bowels of San Francisco as people from these forsakenly diverse shitholes would not be able to elicit the same degree of empathy. Although just speculation, I have always had the feeling that certain self-loathing white liberals and hipsters enjoy Twin Peaks simply because it provides them with the rare (subconscious) guilty pleasure of racial solidarity as the show’s pathological quirkiness and Lynch’s art fag cred provides them with the perfect cover for such a preternatural indulgence. Of course, the very fact that cultural Marxist film critics would even consider that Twin Peaks has a large non-white audience and that said non-white audience is upset about the show’s lack of melanin just goes to show how out-of-touch they are with race and culture. In short, the average non-white fan of the show is clearly deracinated and an outlier and probably the sort of individual that does not much like living among their own racial kinsmen. Undoubtedly, one of the many things that makes Northern Exposure (1990–1995)—a show that clearly reveals its main influence during the fifth episode ‘The Russian Flu’ of the first season with an overt waterfall dream-sequence homage—glaringly inferior to Twin Peaks is its absurdly arrogant NYC Judaic protagonist and the contemptible  way he treats the local yokels.  After all, one of the things that makes Agent Cooper so lovable is that, despite their flaws, he still loves the locals and would love nothing more than to become a permanent member of their community.




 Although just speculation, I like to think that Lynch was on a somewhat respectable mission to troll his fans when he dreamed up Twin Peaks: The Return, namely due to the fact that Agent Cooper barely appears on the show, at least in his normal perennially jovial “damn fine coffee” form that everyone loves. Indeed, although lead actor Kyle MacLachlan, who undoubtedly gives the greatest performance of his career, appears onscreen more than every other actor, he portrays no less than three (but really four) different ‘characters’: Agent Cooper, Cooper’s evil doppelganger, and a degenerate tulpa created by the doppelganger named Douglas ‘Dougie’ Jones. While Agent Cooper manages to escape from the Black Lodge at the beginning of the series, he returns to earth in a meta-autistic form (hence, the ‘fourth’ character) and is only really a preposterously pathetic shell of a man that he once was, though he is certainly more agreeable than the pudgy sheboon-banging tulpa whose life he unintentionally takes over.  Cooper-as-Dougie is like a living embodiment of what Aryan pessimistic Arthur Schopenhauer meant when he spoke of ‘The Will’ (or ‘Lower Soul’), which he described in his classic text The World as Will and Representation (1818/19) as, “The will, considered purely in itself, is devoid of knowledge, and is only blind, irresistible urge, as we see it appear in inorganic and vegetable nature and in their laws, and also in the vegetative part of our own life.  Through the addition of the world as representation, developed for its service, the will obtains knowledge of its own willing and what it wills, namely that this is nothing but this world, life, precisely as it exists.  We have therefore called the phenomenal world the mirror, the objectively, of the will.”  A chubby and ridiculously cheaply dressed degenerate with a gambling addiction and a fetish for busty yet absurdly brainless pitch black negress prostitutes, Dougie is a sort of sad ‘missing link’ between Agent Cooper and his evil doppelganger.

While Coop is a good man that always tries to do the right thing and the doppelganger is a devilish dickhead of a dude that seems to lack all the positive aspects that make people human and thus completely embraces evil in all its forms, Dougie is a virtual empty void and simply a morally weak and hopelessly self-indulgent fool. For most of the show, Agent Cooper lives as Dougie as if he is a prisoner in his own body in an acting performance from MacLachlan that arguably puts Peter Sellers’ character in Being There to abject shame in terms of sheer absurdist retardisms. Undoubtedly, MacLachlan’s performance(s) are more adequately comparable to Sellers’ legendary multi-role performance in Stanley Kubrick’s classic Cold War era satire Dr. Strangelove (1964). Unlike with Sellers’ characters in Kubrick’s film, the various Coopers depicted in Twin Peaks seem like extreme archetypal representations of Lynch himself. Of course, Cooper’s doppelganger can be seen as a representation of both Agent Cooper and Lynch’s Jungian ‘shadow aspect,’ just as Frank Booth was arguably Jeffrey Beaumont’s (and Lynch’s) in Blue Velvet. Indeed, it is no coincidence that Booth stares into Beaumont’s eyes and matter-of-factly declares, “You're like me” during an extremely emotionally pivotal scene in the film. Naturally, it is no surprise that Twin Peaks concludes with Agent Cooper acting like a sort of strange amalgam of himself, his doppelganger, and his tupla. In the end, Coop seems to have, to his grand abject horror, achieved Jungian ‘Individuation’ (incidentally, Mexican-American artist Manuel DeLanda, who also experimented with neo-noir as demonstrated by his arguable cinematic magnum opus Raw Nerves: A Lacanian Thriller (1980), also works with the concept of principium individuationis).




 While somewhat cryptic, I think the final message of the series can be summed up to some degree with the following aphorism from Oswald Spengler, “The question of whether world peace will ever be possible can only be answered by someone familiar with world history. To be familiar with world history means, however, to know human beings as they have been and always will be. There is a vast difference, which most people will never comprehend, between viewing future history as it will be and viewing it as one might like it to be. Peace is a desire, war is a fact; and history has never paid heed to human desires and ideals.” After all, at the end of Twin Peaks, positively positive do-gooder idealist Agent Cooper, who does not seem to even consider the possible ramifications of his somewhat curious actions, manages to more or less unwittingly destroy himself, history, and everyone he knows just by traveling back in time to the night when Laura Palmer died to prevent her ill-fated demise via incestuous filicide. Also, Agent Cooper’s quest can arguably be simply summarized with Spengler’s words, “Free will is a feeling, not a fact.” Judging by these themes, it is hard to fathom how Lynch could fall for something as painfully deluded and idiotically idealistic as Transcendental Meditation, but I guess the auteur has to have something to believe in and can always dream of being a masterful Yogic Flyer that rivals Baron Vladimir Harkonnen in terms of bouncing around like a bloated beach ball, as one simply cannot stay completely grounded with so much hubris. Still, it is hard to reconcile the conclusion of Twin Peaks with the following ridiculous remark Lynch made during a preposterously shallow interview at beliefnet.com, “As Maharishi teaches, mankind was not made to suffer. Bliss is our nature. Life should be blissful, and blissful doesn’t mean just a small happiness. It’s huge. It is profound. It’s like totality. This atma becomes brahma, totality. It’s there, it’s our potential, it’s our birthright to enjoy enlightenment. You just need to unfold it.” After all, in Twin Peaks, human suffering seems to be one of the greatest, if nothing the greatest, driving force of humanity and something that simply cannot be avoided. Undoubtedly, it is a great irony that Lynch could create psychobabble-babbling charlatan like the character Dr. Lawrence Jacoby while at the same time peddling the most preposterous of would-be-exotic pseudo-religions. While TM® might have provided Lynch with a sort of (pseudo)spiritual safe space as a kind of outlet for his own personal demons, Twin Peaks and most of his other cinematic works reveal that Lynch has more spiritually in common with Calvinism than a post-Hindu corporation-cum-cult (incidentally, Lynch was raised Presbyterian). 




 Rather hilariously, in the fairly worthwhile documentary David Lynch: The Art Life (2016) co-directed by a curious trio of multicultural bros, Lynch recounts an anecdote about he got stoned on ganja and then pissed off his Jewish ex-roommate, hack musician Peter Wolf (real name Peter Blankfield), by abruptly walking out of a Bob Dylan concert. Indeed, apparently Wolf approached him and bitched like a stereotypical dumb hippie, “nobody walks out on Dylan,” to which Lynch replied, “I walked out on Dylan. Get the fuck out of here!,” thus ending their truly absurd interracial friendship. During the same segment of doc, Lynch also mocks Dylan's diminutive size, which is surely not the way you are supposed to refer to a kosher commie (pseudo)folk musician turned rock star that has unequivocally achieved god status among the sort of philistines and philo-semites that take mainstream American pop culture history seriously. For this and various other reasons, I can only assume that Lynch is, at the very least, a sort of subconscious antisemite. Of course, Justin Theroux’s rather loathsome character—a literal cuckold that gets righteously told off due to his preposterous (and quite quintessentially Judaic) passive-aggressive attitude by a stoic Nordic cowboy—in Mulholland Drive (2001) absolutely screams stereotypical Hebraic Hollywood hack filmmaker. Likewise, Twin Peaks character Albert Rosenfield is a virtual archetype of the stereotypical hypocritical Jewish leftist type as an arrogant jerk-off that treats nice rural white folks like garbage while proudly proclaiming to be a proud humanist and neo-peacenik of sorts. Naturally, Lynch is covertly conservative in other ways, as he seems to have a less than favorable view of fags as indicated by the sinister sod pimp ‘Ben’ portrayed by Dean Stockwell in Blue Velvet, not to mention the unhinged dykes in Mulholland Drive. Additionally, Lynch clearly was not attempting to appeal to the NAACP when he had Nicholas Cage brutally beat to death a superlatively sleazy negro criminal named Bobby Ray Lemon at the very beginning of Wild at Heart (1990).  In fact, just as certain leftist film critics have complained, Lynch is not too big on negro characters in general as demonstrated by the sheer lack of them in his films, but one should not expect anything less from an auteur with a quite preternaturally white aesthetic that will simply just alienate most blacks.  After all, filmmakers that cast pointless token negroid characters in films are the lowest and most pathetically phony of cultural cucks and should be treated at thus, as real art is never about compromise.



Rather unfortunately, instead of embracing his more politically correct impulses, Lynch—a rather intuitive artist that has never succumbed to the autistic artistic con of abstract intellectualism—has embraced the grotesque absurdist escapism of worshiping a dirty old brown Indian untermensch that had an affinity for debasing his young white female followers, or so one learns while watching the somewhat disturbing documentary David Wants to Fly (2010) directed by nerdy Teutonic documentarian David Sieveking. In the doc, Sieveking—a fanatical Lynch fan that tries in vain to model his life after the maestro—attempts to embrace Transcendental Meditation, only to discover that TM® is an evil all-consuming corporation and that the filmmaker is, rather unfortunately, one of its most active yet mindless propagandists. As his cinematic output, including Twin Peaks: The Return, certainly demonstrates, Lynch is a conservative at heart and TM® simply seems to be his superlatively misguided attempt to embrace tradition and spirituality in a world where his own race, culture, and religion is being systematically dismantled by kosher culture-distorters, treacherous slave-morality-ridden white ethno-masochists, aberrosexuals, and the various other forms of (sub)human rabble. If any one doubts Lynch’s wounded Faustian soul, one just needs to think deeply about the spirit of his art and then be directed towards British philosopher Roger Scruton’s remark in the essay Conservatism and the Conservatory: “The real reason people are conservatives is that they are attached to the things that they love, and want to preserve them from abuse and decay. They are attached to their family, their friends, their religion, and their immediate environment. They have made a lifelong distinction between the things that nourish and the things that threaten their security and peace of mind.”

Additionally, the spirit of Twin Peaks unquestionably has more to do with Teutonic pessimism than the proto-hippie-dippy bullshit of shit-brown charlatan Maharishi Mahesh Yogi as indicated by the following quote from Nietzsche, “And do you know what “the world” is to me? Shall I show it to you in my mirror? This world: a monster of energy, without beginning, without end; a firm, iron magnitude of force that does not grow bigger or smaller, that does not expend itself but only transforms itself; as a whole, of unalterable size, a household without expenses or losses, but likewise without increase or income; enclosed by “nothingness” as by a boundary; not something blurry or wasted, not something endlessly extended, but set in a definite space as a definite force, and not a space that might be “empty” here or there, but rather as force throughout, as a play of forces and waves of forces, at the same time one and many, increasing here and at the same time decreasing there; a sea of forces flowing and rushing together, eternally changing, eternally flooding back, with tremendous years of recurrence, with an ebb and a flood of its forms; out of the simplest forms striving toward the most complex, out of the stillest, most rigid, coldest forms striving toward the hottest, most turbulent, most self-contradictory, and then again returning home to the simple out of this abundance, out of the play of contradictions back to the joy of concord, still affirming itself in this uniformity of its courses and its years, blessing itself as that which must return eternally, as a becoming that knows no satiety, no disgust, no weariness: this, my Dionysian world of the eternally self-creating, the eternally self-destroying, this mystery world of the twofold voluptuous delight, my “beyond good and evil,” without goal, unless the joy of the circle is itself a goal; without will, unless a ring feels good will toward itself— do you want a name for this world? A solution for all of its riddles? A light for you, too, you best-concealed, strongest, most intrepid, most midnightly men?— This world is the will to power—and nothing besides! And you yourselves are also this will to power—and nothing besides!”  Indeed, Nietzsche's quote might seem like a megalomaniac tirade, but somehow I think that, aside from the ‘will to power’ bit, it makes for a great esoteric synopsis of the series.  Needless to say, Lynch could have learned a great deal more from Savitri Devi's ultra-hip brand on Hinduism than the shallow Dharma that Maharishi gleefully defecated out for his dumb (yet oftentimes rich) white followers.



Indeed, for better or worse, Twin Peaks: The Return—an intricate and multilayered episodic epic set in a titular town that has only further degenerated over the decades to the point where virtually no character seem redeemable—is, despite its many moments of humor, a work of immense hopeless sadness and longing for a time and place that died when Lynch was still a child, if not before. In fact, after watching the series twice, I cannot reconcile the fact that the same man that was the mastermind of the show was also responsible for writing in his rather disappointing book Catching the Big Fish: Meditation, Consciousness, and Creativity (2006), “Negativity is like darkness.  So what is darkness?  You look at darkness, and you see that it's really nothing: It's the absence of something.  You turn on the light, and darkness goes.  But sunlight, for instance, doesn't get rid of negativity.  It gets rid of darkness, but not negativity.  So what light can you turn on that removes negativity the way sunlight removes darkness?  It's the light of pure consciousness, the Self—the light of unity.  Don't fight the darkness.  Don't even worry about the darkness.  Turn on the light and the darkness goes.  Turn up that light of pure consciousness: Negativity goes.  Now you say, ‘That sounds so sweet.’  It sounds too sweet.  But it's a real thing.”  Personally, I think it sounds like total bullshit, especially coming from someone like Lynch who manages to make scenarios involving violent rapes and murder quite humorous and a mensch who followed up the birth of his first born child by directing a film where a father brutally murders his mutant baby.  As his work unequivocally demonstrates, Lynch is a man that basks and even thrives in both the literal and figurative darkness and no amount of spouting pseudo-metaphysical mumbo jumbo from some insufferably effete brown charlatan is going to change that.



Notably, Arthur Schopenhauer once wrote, “Every parting is a foretaste of death, and every reunion a foretaste of resurrection.  That is why even people who were indifferent to one another rejoice so much when they meet again after twenty or thirty years.”  Of course, the same can be said of people being reunited with an old show like Twin Peaks, yet I feel that it is only appropriate that the series and Lynch's career have reached their natural conclusion.  Indeed, the final moments of the final episode of Twin Peaks: The Return undoubtedly have the bittersweet foretaste of death, but I would not have it any other way.  In fact, the event series might even be seen as a sort of esoteric epitaph for America, or at least the true white America that Lynch spent his entire life mourning via his gorgeously grotesque portraits of absurdist Americana.  When H.P. Lovecraft complained in a personal letter that New York City had been “completely Semiticized” and thereupon tragically lost to the “national fabric,” he could have been speaking of the contemporary United States, at least in the cultural and spiritual sense.  In that regard, D.H. Lawrence was certainly right when he wrote, “My great religion is a belief in the blood, the flesh, as being wiser than the intellect.  We can go wrong in our minds.  But what our blood feels and believes and says, is always true.”  After all, Lynch's book Catching the Big Fish is terribly written and a testament to his largely irrational and anti-intellectual disposition, but his singular oeuvre reveals a certain Weltschmerz and Sehnsucht in relation to the WASP world that the auteur's generation—the so-called ‘baby boomer’ bunch that turned their unearned and undeserved gift of unrivaled prosperity and comfort into a racially, culturally, and sexually apocalyptic nightmare—gleefully destroyed.  Needless to say, Transcendental Meditation is a symptom of the very sort of degeneracy that Lynch's films lament in fashion that is iconically American as Norman Rockwell but as jovially venomous as Luis Buñuel. Considering that the United States, or the true Euro-American U.S., is nothing more than a glorified European mega-colony, it is only fitting that one of the last, if not the last, great filmmaker is an American.

In his somewhat out-of-date but surely worthwhile book David Lynch (Twayne's Filmmakers Series) (1992), Kenneth C. Kaleta—an obvious Lynch fan that thankfully does not subscribe to any Frankfurt School oriented theories—argues, “Lynch has put his brand on TV.  He has stretched again, this time from film to television.  He continues that expansion regardless of critical bouquets garnered or awards lost, regardless of cancellation or glorification of the series.  Unlike Andy Warhol, who also moved from plastic art into the world of film, Lynch must not falter into creating art not from but simply of his world.  Warhol electrified pop art with his Day Glo paintings.  Yet Warhol is more celebrated for his lifestyle [...] David Lynch's artistic creations include Lynch himself.  He continues beyond precedent to display, to satirize, and to expand his contemporary aesthetic.  Somewhere, of course, a line may be crossed and his balance knocked off center.  Here, over the border, the artist wakes up to be merely an icon.  This is the quagmire of twentieth-century celebrity.  The significance of TWIN PEAKS may be obvious today, but the series's place in the context of Lynch's work—and its meaning for art tomorrow—remains open to speculation.”  While Lynch has indeed transformed into a sort of somewhat cardboard celebrity art fag and icon, Twin Peaks: The Return reveals that he is an artist of the same caliber as Edgar Allan Poe, who Kaleta rightly compares him to, or as he wrote, “Like Poe's verse, TWIN PEAKS is poetic—inherently rhythmic.  It has a first-person speaker: the straightest, fairest, most literal hero, Dale Cooper.  In the televised serial, Agent Cooper even reads impressions into a tape recorder, thus not only making the audience party to his telling, but involving it through his language, his rhythm, and the sound of his voice.  As in Poe's world, no matter the peculiarities of the incidents, the audience is assured by the speaker's voice.  Ironically, neither offers a universal world; rather comfort is found in idiosyncrasies: Cooper is as distinctive a first-person speaker as any found in Poe's poetry.”  Indeed, containing a truly American lyrical folk poetry worthy of Poe and an entire preternatural mythos comparable to Lovecraft in terms of depth of imagination, Lynch managed to perform something that is nothing short of alchemy by turning a shit medium into boob tube gold.  Of course, only Lynch could turn a blue-blonde corpse wrapped in plastic into something deeply romantic, so it is only fitting that said corpse literally disappears into thin air at the conclusion of Twin Peaks: The Return, as no other artist—be they cinematic auteur or otherwise—will ever be able to fill his big goofy shoes when he is gone.



-Ty E

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

Naked Tango




While Paul Schrader is, at least to some extent, a failed filmmaker in the sense that very few of his films have been monetarily successful and, more importantly, he oftentimes fails when it comes to translating his screenplays into fully realized films (indeed, it is no coincidence that he is best known for his screenplay for Martin Scorsese's Taxi Driver), his older and lesser known brother Leonard, who only managed to direct a single feature during his somewhat sad life, is indubitably an artistic failure that was never able to reach anywhere near his full artistic potential.  Although surely no masterpiece, Leonard's sole feature Naked Tango (1990) is undoubtedly a intriguing film worthy of reexamination and a cinematic work that reveals that the auteur had the potential to be just as subversive and innovative of a filmmaker as his much better known younger brother. Probably best remembered among cinephiles and film historians for penning the Academy Award nominated screenplay for the poof prison flick Kiss of the Spider Woman (1985) directed by Argentine-born Brazilian Jew Héctor Babenco and based on a novel by Argentine novelist Manuel Puig (whose work played a crucial influence on Naked Tango), Leonard—a draft-dodger that spent most of his life living and working in Japan after fleeing there in a successful attempt to avoid the Vietnam War—is undoubtedly a depressing example of misspent intellect and artistic talent.

To anyone that is familiar with the somewhat sleazy but highly entertaining book Easy Riders, Raging Bulls: How the Sex-Drugs-and-Rock 'N Roll Generation Saved Hollywood (1998) by Peter Biskind, it is easy to understand why the elder Schrader, who died under dubious circumstances in 2006, is all but forgotten yet his younger brother Paul has managed to direct a new film every year or two ever since his debut feature Blue Collar (1978) about forty years ago. Indeed, as Paul, who managed to snag the sole credit for their first Hollywood collaboration—the screenplay for Sydney Pollack's somewhat uneven The Yakuza (1974)—confessed in the book, “I had always treated Leonard badly. Taking sole screenwriting credit on THE YAKUZA wasn’t very nice. Treating him as an employee wasn’t very nice. Throughout all that, he had one thing that I didn’t have, which was Japan. And then came MISHIMA, and I stole Japan from him.” Apparently, The Yakuza credit and Japan were not the only things that Paul stole from his brother, or as Biskind somewhat questionably argued, “Ironically, his best film as a director was his first, BLUE COLLAR, which he more or less disavowed. Says Leonard, ‘My brother finds BLUE COLLAR embarrassing. One reason is, he hadn’t yet developed his polish-jewel CAT PEOPLE style. The other is, he didn’t write it.’ Meaning, of course, that Leonard wrote it.” Of course, the brothers, who both spent their younger years fetishizing the virtues of suicide and even had a number of paternal uncles and cousins commit suicide, have a number of things in common, namely their obsession with sex and death and especially a seemingly seamless combination of the two.  Notably, nearly a decade before directing his first feature, Schrader acted as co-director of the unintentionally entertaining and unquestionably exploitative leftist agitprop doc The Killing of America (1982) co-directed by Sheldon Renan. More or less a glorified snuff film featuring various pieces of classic true crime stock-footage, the somewhat deluded documentary now seems like a sick piece of leftist moral posturing when compare to the director's uniquely unhinged sadomasochistic melodrama Naked Tango. Like many of his brother’s cinematic works, Leonard’s film wallows in sex and death, but also dance, which is ultimately depicted as the height of orgasmic embrace and an activity that is driven largely by sheer sexual magnetism. 




 Featuring suicide, rape, murder, prostitution, homosexuality, Jewish organized crime, flapper fetishism, abattoirs, oedipal gangsters, and a delightfully dichotomous combination of high and low kultur that manages to combine the Symbolist paintings of Teutonic maestro Frank von Stuck with the gritty film noir sleaze of Howard Hawks' pre-Code guido gangster classic Scarface (1932), Naked Tango is undoubtedly an ambitious failure of sorts, but it is also a preternaturally engulfing failure and arguably one of the most elegant ‘bad movies’ ever made. An unintentional experiment in high-camp excess that attempts to juggle elements of film noir and classic melodrama and pays homage to both the short career of Latin heartthrob Rudolph Valentino and and the surreal sadomasochism of late era Luis Buñuel (indeed, Fernando Rey does not star in the film as a cuckolded judge for no reason), Schrader’s film certainly deserves comparisons to a number of subversive arthouse ‘mad love’ themed films, including Bernardo Bertolucci’s Last Tango in Paris (1972), Liliana Cavani’s The Night Porter (1974), Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s swansong Querelle (1982), and David Lynch’s Blue Velvet (1986) and Wild at Heart (1990). In terms of its mongrelized cultural pedigree and dubious execution, the film also has much in common with the similarly flawed yet nonetheless underrated Orphic Belgian-Dutch-French co-production Mascara (1987) directed by Patrick Conrad and starring Charlotte Rampling and Michael Sarrazin. Undoubtedly, like Mascara, Naked Tango is what Manny Farber would have described as ‘termite art’ as a cinematic work that, for better or worse, attempts to exterminate pre-existing boundaries, exhibits undeniable artistic audaciousness, and wallows in economy of expression, among other things. In terms of being a somewhat arthouse-ish psychosexual thriller set in a culturally confused Buenos Aires, Argentina that makes various overt cinephiliac references to classic Hollywood movies, Schrader’s film also has some somewhat superficial similarities with the homoerotic Argentine-British film Apartment Zero (1988) starring Colin Firth and Hart Bochner. Despite its somewhat glaring artsy fartsy qualities, Schrader’s flick might be best summed up as a carefully culturally marinated combination of G. W. Pabst’s Pandora’s Box (1929), Dirty Dancing (1987), and Sergio Leone’s Once Upon a Time in America (1984), albeit sans any sort of tangible commercial appeal. 



 Aside from an extremely rare out-of-print VHS, Naked Tango has, somewhat curiously, never been released in the United States in any other home media format. Although just speculation, I can only assume that the film was at least partially buried by its mainstream Hollywood distributor due to its less than flattering depiction of Jews and Jewish history. Indeed, the film is based on the real-life Jewish organized group Zwi Migdal and their international trafficking of young Jewesses from the shtetls of Eastern Europe for sexual slavery during a relatively long period that began in the 1860s and did not end until 1939 after an ex-prostitute named Raquel Liberman started a campaign that ultimately led to their downfall. Somewhat shockingly, the film does not feature a single redeemable Judaic character and instead is full of grotesque Jewish caricatures, namely a cowardly and craven young pimp with an obscene Oedipus complex and his similarly malevolent money-grubbing madam mommy. Incidentally, the film was produced by Jewish producer David Weisman—a protégé of Otto Preminger—who previously produced Paul Morrissey less than philo-semitic mafia satire Spike of Bensonhurst (1988). Notably, Schrader and Weisman previously had a quite monetarily and critically fruitful collaboration with Kiss of the Spider Woman, which seems to be a little bit too polished when compared to the visceral elegance of Naked Tango. Of course, Schrader only acted as a screenwriter on the previous film, but it seems that Weisman somehow expected the first-time-auteur to recapture the same success, albeit with a less than semitically sensitive twist. Naturally, a film about Jewish sex slavery would not be complete without a voluptuous seductive Jewess like Mathilda May of Tobe Hooper’s Lifeforce (1985) fame and her supple Khazar milkers (while I typically find Jewesses to be innately grotesque, May is a half-breed and it seems her Swedish genes have done her well in both the titty and derriere department).

It should also be noted that various mainstream film critics criticized Naked Tango when it was released due to its less than philo-semitic approach to depicting history.  For exampled, assumed chosenite Ralph Novak complained in his September 16, 1991 review for People magazine that, “Great emphasis is placed on Morales’s Jewishness, for no clear reason.”  Of course, Novak is either being willingly ignorant and/or he did not do his homework, as the film is based on a well-known real-life kosher crime syndicate.  Additionally, the Jewish pimp played by Esai Morales hardly seems like a Jewish caricature in terms of physical appearance and certainly does not resemble a cunning gremlin like infamous real-life mobster Meyer Lansky.  In short, Naked Tango is probably too aesthetically flattering when it comes to depicting Judaic pimps and gangsters.  It seems that film specialists and academics are also unaware that it exists, as it does not get a single reference in Russell Campbell's book Marked Women: Prostitutes and Prostitution in the Cinema (2006), which has been marketed as being the definitive text on the representation of female prostitution in cinema history. Incidentally, the book, which covers everything from New German Cinema to retro Swedish pornography, does dedicate a number of pages to Taxi Driver, which of course Schrader's brother Paul is famous for penning.



 Admittedly, while I don’t know shit about any form of dancing or ballet, I do have a certain inexplicable fondness for a number of idiosyncratic dance and ballet flicks, including (but certainly not limited to), Max Reichmann’s experimental Das Blumenwunder (1926) aka Miracle of Flowers, Swiss auteur Daniel Schmid’s debut feature Heute nacht oder nie (1972) aka Tonight or Never, Ingmar Bergman's somewhat obscure avant-garde short De fördömda kvinnornas dans (1976) aka The Condemned Women Dance, the sod serial killer oriented Dead Dreams of Monochrome Men (1989) and other Physical Theatre Company DV8 production related films, Rosa von Praunheim’s bizarre neo-Expressionist Anita Berber biopic Anita: Tänze des Lasters (1987) aka Anita: Dances of Vice, and even total senseless trash like Lucio Fulci’s dance-giallo Murder Rock (1984) aka Slashdance and mercurial guido auteur Peter Del Monte’s abortive arthouse neo-fairytale Etoile (1988) aka Ballet starring a rather young and nubile Jennifer Connelly. Indeed, I also regard the ‘danse macabre’ scene in Belgian master auteur André Delvaux’s Un soir, un train (1968) aka One Night... A Train as being among one of the most startlingly haunting scenes in cinema history. While I personally find tango music to be rather aesthetically disagreeable, it is an innate and imperative ingredient in what is ultimately a mostly delectable, yet sometimes bittersweet, cinematic cuisine that manages to combine an eclectic collection of ingredients, including Jewish gangsters, cabaret, proto-fascist aesthetics, Expressionism, Franz von Stuck, Rudolph Valentino worship, flapper sluts, and the perils of elegant excess, among other things. An erotic arthouse flick disguised as a trashy quasi-musical with a somewhat hermetic period setting, Naked Tango is arguably a grand artistic failure but it also indubitably the dead serious expression of a sick failed artist’s wounded soul, thereupon making it a quite apt first (and last) feature for Schrader.   Indeed, while Schrader may have only been able to direct one feature film during his life, he at least has never directed anything as hopelessly embarrassing as the incoherent shabbos goy tier shoah shit show Adam Resurrected (2008) or the totally worthless Nicholas Cage vehicle The Dying of the Light (2014) like his younger brother.  Additionally, Mathilda May makes for a much more appealing prostitute than Richard Gere in Schrader's somewhat uneven Bressonian crime-romance American Gigolo (1980).



 While the film’s young and beauteous heroine Stephanie (Mathilda May) might be quite easy on the eyes, it is somewhat hard to sympathize with her plight as she is, quite simply, a spoiled little bitch that dares to wallow in self-pity because she made the obvious mistake of marrying an old fart simply because he was a rich and respected judge. Indeed, Stephanie socially cuckolds her husband Juez Torres (Fernando Rey)—a man that seems to genuinely care for his wife despite having nothing in common with her—at the beginning of the film while they are vacationing on a cruise by dancing with a handsome young waiter, who initially mistakes her spouse for her father. While her husband purports to be a legendary tango dancer and she herself loves to tango, Stephanie is clearly disgusted at the thought of any sort of physical contact with Juez; be it sexual or otherwise. When Juez dares to berate her for her rather obnoxious quasi-slutty public behavior by declaring, “Stop making a scene. You’re acting worse than a whore,” she throws a rather childish fit, storms out of the dance hall and then heads to the deck of a ship where she is somewhat shocked to witness a beautiful nubile young girl stripping off all of her clothes and then committing suicide by jumping overboard. Clearly not the sort of person to miss the opportunity to exploit a good tragedy, Stephanie immediately decides to fake her own death and trades places with the mysterious dead girl by stealing her clothes and then leaving her own items at the scene of the glorious suicidal plunge. Upon discovering the dead girl’s journal, Stephanie discovers that the deceased was a a Jewish mail-order bride from Poland and that she is traveling to Buenos Aires to wed a kosher chap. Unfortunately for Stephanie, her mysterious husband-to-be is actually a sly pimp and gangster named Zico Borenstein (Esai Morales) that runs a stylish whorehouse with his obscenely overbearing and equally morally bankrupt mother (Cipe Lincovsky).  In short, Stephanie unwittingly goes from riches-to-rags, though she ultimately also goes from being a dishonest whore that married for money to becoming an honest enslaved pussy-peddler that does not even get to keep the money that her she actually earned via whoredom.



 Upon arriving in Buenos Aires, Zico—a fairly young man whose counterfeit suaveness is only rivaled by his well hidden cowardice—acts like quite the prim and pristine gentleman and even provides Stephanie with a very expensive diamond ring. Although he intends to turn her into a servile sex slave that makes him cash with her gash, Zico also talks up the local neighborhood, even bragging in regard to his corrupt little ghetto, “You’re going to be very happy here. It’s so much better than the old country. We are very proud of our Jewish community. Before we go back, I’ll introduce you to our kosher butcher, the grocer, the banker, the doctor . . . everyone with money. I mean, everyone important. You’ll be surprised at how fast they make you feel at home.”  Notably, Stephanie makes no attempt to pretend she is Jewish and Zico does not seem to suspect that she is a duplicitous shiksa that has her own dubious agenda, thus somewhat ironically making them the perfect couple as far as deceptive behavior and morally bankruptcy are concerned. Also, somewhat ironically, it is ultimately a man that initially displays nil interest in fucking her that makes her feel the most comfortable in her own pearly pale skin. Of course, as woman that married an old fart that she has no physical or emotional chemistry with, Stephanie certainly sees it as beneath her to peddler her pussy at the behest of a kosher nostra gangster for a mere couple of shekels that she will not even be able to keep herself. Luckily, Stephanie will at least finally meet a mensch that eventually falls head over heels in love with her in his own preternatural yet highly flattering fashion, thus naturally reaffirming her regret in regard to getting stuck in a loveless marriage. Unfortunately but not surprisingly, Naked Tango—a film where two somewhat unhinged weirdos with sadomasochistic tendencies discover the ecstatic highs and crushing lows of visceral mad love—does not have a happy ending, at least not in the conventional sense.  In short, the (anti)heroine discovers that raw passion always has a hefty price, even when you're a busty little bitch that could have virtually any man you want.



 When Stephanie first meets her great love ‘Cholo’ (Vincent D'Onofrio)—a pathologically cryptic yet hyper hip tango maestro that is high on his own idiosyncratic brand of swag—she is wielding two knives and is fully prepared to defend herself, as she has just stabbed her (pseudo)husband Zico and a grotesquely obese jeweler named Bertoni (played by famous Yiddish actor Zero Mostel’s fairly unknown son Josh Mostel). Indeed, on their wedding night, Zico attempted to consummate the marriage by forcing a completely unwitting Stephanie to smoke the lard ass jeweler’s seemingly ungodly awful choad. Of course, Stephanie, who had no idea that her husband was a pernicious pimp, naturally resisted and thus was forced to stab both Zico and Bertoni in the process. Proving to be the only man that can control Stephanie, Cholo literally grabs her by the pussy and the lifts her up in the air, though he is in for somewhat of a shock when he immediately develops a completely electric erotic attraction while she is attempting to stab him, as if he can immediately sense, like an ancient vampire, a fellow unhinged tango fanatic. Although practically worshiped by virtually every single woman (and even some men) in the area, Cholo loathes sex and seems to see tango dancing as a substitute that is much purer and authentic than actual coitus. Indeed, as a flaming fag hairdresser named Gastón (Patricio Bisso) states in regard to Cholo’s preternatural proclivities, “We’d all give our long lost cherries to sleep with him but he sleeps with horses. He’s never given any girl a second look.”  With Stephanie, Cholo gives her a whole lot more than a second look and he ultimately pays the greatest price for it.

While Zico attempts to coerce Cholo into killing Stephanie since she is a witness-cum-perpetrator in the murder of the mafia-connected jeweler Bertoni and thus can get them in trouble with a ruthless outfit of Italian gangsters known as the ‘Black Hand,’ he cannot break his almost immediately self-destructive obsession with her and instead immediately proceeds to focus on transforming her into a sort of designer whore of his dreams. Indeed, after forcing her to get a dark black Louise Brooks-esque flapper hairdo and to take the exotic whore name ‘Alba,’ Cholo—a suave and romantic yet seemingly sociopathic sicko that commits violence and murder with a certain unrivaled finesse that is comparable to his tango moves—cannot stop his rather deleterious obsession with making love with Stephanie via tango. On top of refusing to shove his almost mythical member in her clearly warm and ready snatch, Cholo also curiously forces Stephanie to wear a blindfold while they dance. In fact, Cholo is such an obsessive lunatic that he also has his own personal three-person tango band that he also forces to wear blindfolds, as if these almost phantom-like elderly musicians, who act as a sort of Greek chorus for the film, are too lowly and aesthetically handicapped to appreciate his perversely penetrating phantasmagoric dance moves. 




 As a result of her role in the death of mob-connected lardo jeweler Bertoni, Stephanie’s life is threatened by both yid pimp Zico and the Black Hand mobsters, so it is a good thing that Cholo becomes absolutely infatuated with her.  Indeed, while best buds with Zico and an associate of sorts with the goombah gangsters of the Black Hand, Cholo does not have to think twice about going to war with both just to defend Stephanie. In fact, after saving her from some somewhat intellectually disadvantaged guido gangsters, Cholo declares to Stephanie, who he has personally rechristened ‘Alba,’ in an almost sinisterly sensual fashion, “I’m sorry. This won’t happen again. Don’t worry, Alba. I’d never let anyone else kill you.” Instead of killing Stephanie, Cholo forces her to do the tango blindfolded sans clothing. While Stephanie is also a tango fanatic of sorts, she much rather have Cholo’s cock and practically begs him for it repeatedly but, unfortunately for her, he sees sex as sickening.  A somewhat paradoxical chap that radiates a certain alluring degree of machismo and androgyny, Cholo is clearly the man of Stephanie's dreams, at least as far as sheer sex appeal is concerned.

When Stephanie cries to Choko while lying naked in pimp Zico’s bed, “I don’t know what sex with you is,” he replies, “Yes, you do. All sex is the same. It just leaves you more sad. The beauty you’re born with does not count. The only thing that counts is the beauty you make.”  If Cholo was an intellectual, one can certainly imagine him saying something in the vein of Georges Bataille like, “Nudity is only death, and the most tender kisses have the after-taste of the rat.”  Incidentally, Stephanie's eventual premature death while involve her nudity.  As Stephanie learns, real beauty to Cholo is doing the tango in a blood-drenched abattoir while sticking a dagger under your lover’s throat. Of course, Stephanie never gives up on attempting to coerce Cholo into jumping her bones, which he eventually does after murdering some pathetic wop gangster. Needless to say, Cholo does not shy away from pounding Stephanie’s puss while her buxom bare ass is sitting on broken glass. In short, the fact that Jewish and guido gangsters are trying to kill them only adds more passion to Stephanie and Cholo’s quite literally lethally lurid love affair. Unfortunately, being a woman, Stephanie still has strong survival instincts and an insatiable thirst for material things, so she eventually betrays Cholo and goes back to her wealthy judge husband, but not before burning a building down and quite selfishly risking the lives of many innocent people in the process, thus underscoring her sense of quasi-sociopathic greed and self-worship. Naturally, Cholo refuses to let Stephanie go and she cannot deny her undying love for the twisted tango maestro, so it is not long before they are reunited.  Needless to say, the lovers are doomed.



 In the spirit of classic European ‘impossible love’ myths like Tristan and Iseult and Orpheus and Eurydice and film reworkings of such perennial stories like the Jean Cocteau-penned Vichy era classic L'Éternel retour (1943) aka The Eternal Return directed Jean Delannoy, Naked Tango naturally concludes in a tragically romantic fashion with the leads being completely destroyed because of their quite impossible forbidden love. Indeed, when Stephanie decides to once again betray her husband and choose Cholo over him, he finally loses his patience and opts to killer her in what can only be described as a crime of cuck passion. Of course, when the judge shoots Stephanie, Cholo immediately retaliates and does so by suavely and quite effortlessly throwing a knife through the old fart's swarthy decrepit Latin neck. In the end, the judge’s henchman—corrupt local Prussian-esque cops that shoot first and ask questions later—unleash a storm of bullets on Cholo and Stephanie as they quite literally take their last dance together. As a symbolic act of both true love and heroic defiance, Cholo uses his last couple moments alive to raise Stephanie lifeless body in the air as if he is trying to vain to send her off to heaven while his feet are just beginning to feel the warmth of the pits of hell.  As individuals that were clearly not built for marriage or kids that indubitably reached the zenith of their love for another, Stephanie and Cholo could not have left this world together in a more appropriate fashion.  Luckily, Cholo manages to execute Zico as revenge for his betrayal shortly before his own death.  Quite symbolically considering the neurotic maternal spirit of Ashkenazi Jewry, Zico's mother seems to be the only one that survives the blood bath and now she can keep all of the whorehouse money for herself instead of splitting it with her pimp son.



 As history certainly demonstrates from Samson’s harlot of Gaza to Heidi ‘Hollywood Madam’ Fleiss, Jews and prostitution go together like peas and carrots, yet Naked Tango is probably the only film that dares to take a fearless and less than politically incorrect approach to the subject. Notably, in her book Lustmord: Sexual Murder in Weimar Germany (1995), Maria Tatar noted in regard to the literary tradition of Jews and prostitution, “Jews came to be linked not only with the perpetrators of sexual murder, but with the victims as well. Like the prostitute, the Jew is seen to represent a serious threat to the moral, fiscal, and sexual economy of the social body. As Sander Gilman has pointed out, both prostitutes and Jews have been liked by what is seen to be a sexualized relation to capital—they have ‘but one interest, the conversion of sex into money or money into sex.’ Unable to find value in transcendent spiritual matters, their interests remain fixed on the material and financial. More important, prostitutes and Jews, because of their spiritual corruption, are considered carriers of sexually transmitted diseases, a view clearly articulated in Hitler’s MEIN KAMPF.” Ironically and somewhat cynically, the protagonists of the film, especially female lead Stephanie, are ultimately destroyed as a result of abandoning material consumption for visceral true love. Interestingly, the leads are ultimately victims of greed and treachery of a Jewish pimp in a film that, quite unintentionally, lends authority to Uncle Adolf's words, “Particularly with regard to syphilis, the attitude of those who guide the nation and the state can only be described as total capitulation […] The cause lies primarily in the prostitution of love […] This Jewification of the spiritual life and mammonization of the mating instinct will sooner or later destroy all of our descendants.” Of course, the protagonists die before they can even produce descendants despite their eventual abandoning of both literal and spiritual prostitution.  Indeed, were it not such a debauched film, Schrader's debut feature could be mistaken as an homage to the classic high-camp melodramas of National Socialist auteur Veit Harlan.  Naturally, the fact that it was directed by a lifelong leftist and draft-dodger that previously directed liberal anti-American agitprop makes Naked Tango seem like an all the more inexplicable cinematic work, so it is really no big surprise that has been tragically consigned to the celluloid dustbin of history.



While Naked Tango certainly seems a little bit culturally mongrelized due to its glaring international cast and mostly pleasantly preternatural period setting that oftentimes more resembles Weimar Berlin than Buenos Aires in terms of aesthetic spirit, the film is indubitably deeply rooted in both cultural and social history and reflects Schrader's sagely understanding of art, cinema, and literature as indicated by the film's use aesthetic influences ranging from Manuel Puig to German Expressionism. Indeed, aside from being inspired by the real-life Jewish sex slavery outfit Zwi Migdal, the film follows in the tradition of certain forgotten Jewish art, or as explained at the Jewish Virtual Library, “Yiddish literature of the early 20th century contains a number of powerful portrayals of the social and personal costs of widespread prostitution including Sholem Asch’s GOD OF VENGEANCE and Perets Hirschbein’s MIRIAM. A 1908 performance of the latter in Buenos Aires led to a bloody public riot.” Of course, the almost gothic-like Jewish ghetto setting seems to be largely window dressing for Schrader’s eclectic aesthetic obsessions. After all, I doubt many Hebraic whorehouses have stained glass windows modeled after some of Franz von Stuck’s greatest paintings, including Die Sünde (1893) aka The Sin and Sphinx (1904).  Somewhat ironically considering the film's degenerate Jewish setting, von Stuck was apparently apparently Adolf Hitler's favorite painter.  Notably, when Aryan Christ Jung wrote in his book Symbols of Transformation (1956) in regard to von Stuck's paintings, “The mixture of anxiety and lust is perfectly expressed in the sultry atmosphere of these pictures,” he certainly could have also been describing Schrader's film.

In a January 07, 1990 interview with John M. Wilson at the Los Angeles Times in regard to the production of the film, Schrader demonstrated he was personally obsessed with romance, arguing, “For me, the essence of romance, for all its high-octane fuel, is for romance to burn itself out. In the ashes of romance can grow a more mature, a different kind of love. The more chance you have to take romance all the way to the end, the more chance you have to be ready for the next phase. Most of us only have the courage to take it halfway.” Of course, the lovers in the film go all the way in terms of their love and pay the ultimate price for it, but as Schrader stated in the same interview, “Most romances keep the element of death hidden under the table. I wanted to put it square in the middle of the table.”



It seems that Schrader, who apparently liked the emotional of security of knowing that he was always sleeping with a loaded weapon under his pillow and thus could kill himself at any time, was a somewhat tragic self-destructive individual who was a slave of the Todestrieb. While putting together Naked Tango in the editing room, Schrader even expressed a certain irrational excitement in regard to the artistic uncertainty of his film, stating, “This is why I love it—every choice, every step, every moment is crucial. I love to be in that position, where I can win or lose, because it means that what I'm doing counts.”  Judging simply by his statement, it makes one wonder whether or not Schrader was attempting to sabotage his own career by making a film about rather unsavory Jewish pimps and gangsters while working in the hyper Hebraic realm of Hollywood. Of course, despite his brother Paul ultimately directing the film, Mishima: A Life in Four Chapters (1985)—a somewhat experimental biopic of the great Japanese novelist and neo-fascist Yukio Mishima—was ultimately Schrader's brainchild and an expression of his own romantic and self-destructive tendencies.  Knowing this, I can only assume that Leonard was the more subversive and intelligent of the two brothers, but sadly it seems he was an underachiever that was too antisocial and just plain mentally ill to establish a filmmaking career that was extensive as his own little bro.  It seems that Schrader was also somewhat lazy, as he spent the majority of his life as ‘script doctor’ which, to quote the failed auteur, allowed him to obtain, “big money for a short amount of work.”  Unfortunately, Naked Tango was ultimately such a huge failure that it is all but totally unknown in Schrader’s own homeland and currently unavailable in any home media format, though it seems to have developed some minor success in Europe and Argentina.

Still, I doubt that Schrader would have ever been capable of developing any sort of big mainstream success.  Indeed, as a strange introverted intellectual that seemed to suffer posttraumatic success as a result of strict and totally movie-less Dutch Calvinist upbringing, the failed auteur probably did not relate to most people.  Additionally, I am not surprised that the man that directed Naked Tango also once candidly confessed, “I would be sitting alone in some room at three o'clock in the morning with a loaded gun, thinking about blowing my brains out.  It was not, ‘I'm having a bad day, I wanted to kill myself’; no, the desire, the need, felt as real as a fucking table. I want to do this, and I never want to do this. I'm three seconds away from it, and I'm three million years away from it. I felt the fever of two things inside me fighting. I was breaking out in a sweat, my temperature was going up from the intensity of it. Sometimes I would just stare at the wall, trying to quiet the heat down, but sometimes the heat kept building, and that's when I was looking for the gun. Triggered by something physical, like I couldn't sleep. I found out that if I stuck the barrel in my mouth, like some infant's pacifier, I could fall asleep. It worked for two or three weeks, and all of a sudden, it didn't work. I'd been sucking on an empty gun. I knew if I loaded the sonofabitch, I was gonna sleep tonight.” While Schrader was apparently not a fag since he was married to a Jap chick, somehow it seems fitting that his real-life, as demonstrated by the above quote, sometimes resembled a scene out of Jean Genet's sole film Un chant d'amour (1950) aka A Song of Love.



-Ty E